Field sobriety tests in a DUID case
Do You Need Legal Help?
Complete and submit this form and we will contact you shortly. * required fields.
Field sobriety tests (commonly referred to as FSTs) are routinely
conducted in California driving under
the influence investigations, whether the driver is suspected
of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. When testifying
about the driver’s performance on these tests, the arresting
officer will do his or her best to convince the judge and jury that
the accused performed them improperly and displayed obvious signs
of impairment. Because this type of testimony is typical in a driving
under the influence of marijuana case, it is critical that the
accused hires a skilled criminal
defense lawyer who knows how to successfully
challenge this type of evidence to help his or her client avoid
the harsh penalties that are frequently
imposed with this offense.
Field sobriety tests vary from state to state, from county to county
and from officer to officer. Although many officers won’t
tell the driver that these tests are voluntary, they are. FSTs are
designed to test balance, coordination and divided attention –
the skills that are deemed necessary to safely drive a car. There
are a wide variety of tests that are used, but there are three that
the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration have classified
as “standard,” which means that there are standard approaches
for their administration and evaluation. These three FSTs include
the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test, which is an eye test,
the one-leg stand and the walk and turn test. The main problem with
these (as well as the non-standardized tests that are frequently
used, such as the finger-to-nose, finger count and the hand-pat
tests) as they relate to a driving under the influence of drugs
(DUID) investigation is that they were designed to test a driver
impaired by alcohol, not drugs. Studies have been conducted that
reveal that individuals who have used marijuana have shown impaired
abilities when it comes to maintaining balance, however, illness,
fatigue and nerves can also contribute to this phenomenon.
In a vigorous effort to convict the accused, the prosecutor will
have the arresting officer testify
about and demonstrate all of the ways that the accused didn’t
perform the tests as he or she was instructed. The prosecutor will
then argue that the accused displayed mental
and/or physical impairment when he or she could not mentally
or physically follow the simple instructions that were provided
at the beginning of the FSTs. However, a
savvy criminal attorney will use those exact same tests to show
a lack of physical and mental impairment and will simultaneously
reveal the officer’s true bias towards making an arrest. The
lawyer will ask the officer to testify about the overwhelming number
of things that the accused did correctly when performing these tests,
pointing out for the judge and jury that the discrepancy clearly
indicates mental and physical competence and that the officer was
only concerned with those issues that pointed to the driver’s
guilt.
Clearly, the accused faces a tough situation when all the evidence
seems to be pointing to his or her guilt. Seasoned officers and
prosecutors know exactly what type of evidence to present to the
judge and jury to make it seem like a suspected drugged driver is
overwhelmingly guilty of driving
under the influence of marijuana. The good news, however, is
that a seasoned DUI defense attorney is just as capable as challenging
this evidence to show that not only did the driver display signs
that showed that he or she was perfectly capable of driving safely
but that the officer conducted a biased investigation, only collecting
evidence that pointed to guilt, dismissing evidence that pointed
to innocence. The outstanding
California DUID attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm have mastered
the defenses that
are available to an individual facing this charge. With law offices
located throughout California, including several in Los Angeles,
they are easily accessible for anyone in need of unsurpassed representation.
For the most trusted legal advice, contact them today for a free
consultation.
|