Motions to suppress evidence
Do You Need Legal Help?
Complete and submit this form and we will contact you shortly. * required fields.
Motions to suppress evidence are pre-trial
motions that are typically filed by the defense in a California
case involving marijuana
and are argued in an effort to keep certain evidence or witness
testimony out of the trial. If the defense successfully argues this
motion, the prosecution may be forced to drop the charges and dismiss
the case altogether. Because of the importance of this type of motion,
it is critical that the accused hires a
skilled criminal attorney who knows what types of issues a judge
would be likely to seriously consider when hearing this kind of
motion and what arguments are most likely to convince the judge
to rule in the defense’s favor.
Motions to suppress evidence are usually filed when the defense
believes that certain evidence (whether it is the marijuana, statements
or other evidence) in a drug case was obtained during an illegal
search and/or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the
United States Constitution. Because prevailing at this type of hearing
depends on not only knowing the state laws that are relevant to
the procedures involved in filing this type of motion but on also
having an in-depth knowledge about federal law and what constitutes
an illegal search and seizure, only an
experienced criminal defense lawyer should attempt to file and
argue a motion to suppress evidence.
The Constitution protects U.S. residents from “unreasonable
searches and seizures” of their property, as well as of their
person. In order to be reasonable, an officer must have a court-issued
warrant before conducting a search or probable cause to believe
that an individual is involved in illegal activity. It must be noted
that a “search” necessarily involves an invasion of
privacy, because, for example, an officer who observes an individual
openly smoking a marijuana cigarette on the street has not had to
search him or her to witness the illegal activity. However, if the
officer simply decided to stop an otherwise unassuming individual
to check his or her pocket for the drug, a search would have ensured.
A “seizure” (using the same scenario) would then refer
to the officer taking the marijuana
and the individual into police custody. Searches and seizures are
premised on one’s “reasonable expectation of privacy”
– if there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, an illegal
search will not be declared – if there was such an expectation,
it becomes a judicial issue. It generally follows that if the search
was illegal, the seizure was, too.
Motions to suppress evidence may also be premised on the fact that
the officer illegally obtained statements in violation of one’s
constitutionally protected right against self-incrimination. If
the accused was taken into custody and questioned about the alleged
incident, he or she would first be legally entitled to receive his
or her Miranda warnings. These are commonly read in movies and on
television and advise a suspect of his or her “right to remain
silent…” Incriminating statements elicited without those
warnings may very well be illegal and the defense will move to suppress
those statements during this hearing. Any evidence that was seized
as a result of an illegal confession will also be declared illegal
and should be additionally suppressed.
When reviewing a client’s case, an experienced California
drug defense attorney will look for the types of issues that will
trigger a motion to suppress evidence. The
outstanding lawyers at The Kavinoky Law Firm pride themselves
on their ability to spot these issues, critically analyze them and
deliver the most compelling legal arguments in their support that
are sure to convince a judge that evidence and/or statements were
illegally obtained and should therefore be suppressed. These exceptional
attorneys have mastered everything related to California marijuana
cases and are well qualified to successfully represent anyone charged
with a marijuana-related offense in this state. To learn more about
a suppression motion or about their unsurpassed defense strategies,
contact The Kavinoky Law Firm today for a free
consultation.
|