Possession of marijuana for sale – lack of
knowledge
Do You Need Legal Help?
Complete and submit this form and we will contact you shortly. * required fields.
Possession of marijuana
for sale is an automatic felony
in California, where as a personal
possession charge may be prosecuted as either a misdemeanor
or a felony, depending on the circumstances. In order to avoid the
severe penalties that
may be imposed in connection with a “for sale” charge,
it is critical that an individual accused of this offense contacts
a California drug crime defense
attorney who is well versed with the many defenses
that are applicable to this crime.
Lack of knowledge is one of these defenses. When a person is charged
with possessing marijuana for sale, the prosecutor must be able
to prove that the individual had the intent to sell the drug and
that he or she had knowledge of its presence and its illegal character.
If these knowledge requirements are successfully rebutted, the jury
is not permitted to return a guilty verdict. The bottom line is
that possession implies knowledge – without it, a possession
charge simply won’t hold up.
Lack of knowledge is challenged in two ways. The first way deals
with a lack of knowledge about the presence of the marijuana. This
type of defense will work best when, for example, an individual
buys new property that has a significant number of marijuana plants
growing on a remote piece of the land. If the plants were discovered
by the police and the property owner was charged with possession
for sale (incidentally, he or she would probably also be charged
with cultivating marijuana
under this scenario), he or she could claim that it was a previous
owner who grew the plants and that he or she had no knowledge of
their existence, as he or she never ventured out to that part of
the land.
Similarly, a lack of knowledge defense
is raised when an individual doesn’t know the illegal character
of the marijuana drug. Looking
to the same scenario, perhaps the new property owner does know that
the plants exist, but doesn’t know that they are marijuana
plants – he or she only knows that “plants” are
growing on the property. Without knowing that the plants are illegal
or that they have a narcotic character, he or she has not committed
a crime. It should be noted that this type of “knowledge”
defense will only apply to someone who has no recorded history of
any drug activities and to someone who didn’t make any incriminating,
contrary statements to the investigating officers.
A lack of knowledge defense, when applied to a possession
of marijuana for sale case will typically work best when the
accused didn’t have actual
(or physical) possession of the drug but rather was charged
with constructive or joint possession of the drug. Although circumstantial
evidence (that is, evidence that isn’t directly observed but
is inferred from events or circumstances that surround it) may be
used to prove that the accused had knowledge about the marijuana,
a good criminal defense lawyer
will know the most effective ways to challenge that evidence so
that the defense will stand.
The exceptional criminal attorneys
at The Kavinoky Law Firm know the ways that a “lack of
knowledge” defense will be best applied and further know how
to successfully convey it to a judge and jury to favorably represent
their clients. They specialize in California drug laws and have
mastered this, as well as the many other defenses that apply to
“possession of marijuana for sale” cases. With law offices
throughout the state, including several in and around Los Angeles,
they are available to provide their outstanding legal advice and
services to anyone in need of a skilled California drug crime defense
attorney. To learn more about the defenses
that apply to a possession for sale charge or for questions about
any other marijuana or drug
related legal matter, contact the firm today for a free
consultation.
|