Personal possession of marijuana – illegal
searches and seizures
Do You Need Legal Help?
Complete and submit this form and we will contact you shortly. * required fields.
Possession of marijuana for
personal use may be charged as either a misdemeanor
or a felony in California, depending on the circumstances under
which the drug was discovered. While the penalties for this offense
aren’t as severe as possessing
marijuana for sale, they can still be serious, which is why
an individual accused of this offense should contact a criminal
attorney who understands this area of the law and all of the defenses
that are applicable to it.
An illegal search and/or seizure will be one of the most useful
defenses if properly argued and proven, as Constitutional violations
can result in the exclusion
of incriminating evidence and a dismissal of one’s criminal
charges. Because this defense requires a thorough understanding
of both California and federal laws, only a skilled criminal defense
lawyer should attempt to present this type of evidence.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects
an individual against unreasonable searches and seizures of his
or her person or property. This law prohibits unreasonable invasions
of privacy, which basically means that police must have a warrant
before conducting a search and that police must have probable cause
to believe that an individual either possesses something illegal
or is involved in illegal activity before stopping that person.
It must be noted that a “search” doesn’t technically
take place unless the individual being searched had a “reasonable
expectation of privacy”. For example, if the police saw a
marijuana cigarette coming
out of someone’s pocket, that wouldn’t qualify as a
search. A search would take place, however, if the police had to
look inside that person’s bedroom dresser to find that same
cigarette. Because a “search” didn’t take place
in the first scenario, a warrant would be unnecessary.
Most personal possession
of marijuana cases involve an arrest and evidence that resulted
from a search and seizure. When the police suspect that an individual
possesses marijuana, a search may involve an inspection of that
individual, his or her surroundings and/or his or her property in
order to locate all of the drugs. If found, a seizure refers to
the confiscation of the marijuana and/or to taking the individual
possessing the marijuana into custody. Generally speaking, if the
seizure is invalid it is because it was preceded by an invalid search.
Both persons and property may legitimately be searched and seized
by the police (either with or without a warrant), as long as circumstances
justified the officers actions. If, however, law enforcement act
without reasonable or “probable cause” or exceed their
Constitutional limitations, their searches and seizures may be declared
invalid and any evidence that they subsequently retrieved will be
excluded from one’s case. An
experienced California drug crime defense attorney will meticulously
review a client’s file to see if the arresting law enforcement
agency violated his or her client’s Constitutional rights
in any way.
The outstanding attorneys at
The Kavinoky Law Firm have mastered the laws (both state and
federal) that are relevant to California drug offenses. When examining
a personal possession
case, they know how to immediately spot an illegal search and/or
seizure and how to effectively convey this type of defense
to the judge and jury. They are dedicated to protecting the rights
of their clients and will aggressively pursue acquittals
when they believe that illegal searches and/or seizures have taken
place and where acquittals aren’t possible, they know the
most effective arguments to convince a judge to impose alternative
sentencing that will permit
their client’s convicted of possessing marijuana for personal
use to receive treatment instead
of a jail sentence. For questions about illegal searches and seizures
or the many other defenses that are applicable to a possession charge,
contact The Kavinoky Law Firm today for a free
consultation and for unsurpassed legal representation.
|