Category: Domestic Violence

California Domestic Violence | Los Angeles Domestic Violence Lawyer | No Cuffs

Another NFL Player Domestic Violence Arrest

Sadly, it comes as no huge surprise another NFL football player was arrested for domestic violence.  For some time now, domestic violence has been an increasing problem for the National Football League (NFL). Many advocates to reduce the amount of violence claim the professional football teams are not doing enough to penalize players accused of violence off the field.

Due to this pressure, and significant amount of publicity with violent crime and the NFL, the National Football League recently updated their personal conduct policy to try and address some of the criticism. However, domestic violence by players continues to plague the sport today.

Ray McDonald Dropped from the Bears

The Chicago Bears released Ray McDonald after arresting him on domestic violence charges in Santa Clara, California. McDonald was a major part of the Bears defense strategy for the season, but after this arrest, they chose to let him go.

Police arrested the 30-year-old defensive end after he allegedly assaulted a woman inside his apartment. The incident took place sometime before 4 a.m. on a Monday morning. According to police reports, McDonald allegedly broke down a bedroom door to get to his former fiancée and their infant child.  when the police arrived, McDonald was not on the scene.

The Santa Clara police department issued McDonald a restraining order for the protection of his fiancée and child.

However, on Wednesday, police arrested McDonald for a second time in a week for violating the restraining order.

Santa Clara detectives found him in a Togo’s sandwich shop in Santa Clara and booked him in a San Jose jail. He reportedly made bail, for $5,000. According to his attorney, they did not know about the restraining order.

A History of “Poor Decision Making”

This wasn’t the first time the defensive lineman was in trouble with the law. This was his third arrest in 9 months. In August 2014, police arrested McDonald on suspicion of domestic violence. In December of the same year, he was arrested for alleged sexual assault. McDonald defended the sexual assault claims as being consensual and filed a defamation suit. Although the victim did not file criminal charges, the 49ers dropped him from the team, citing “a pattern of poor decision-making.”

Then, the Bears picked him up. Despite his past arrests, based on a solid conversation, the team trusted he would behave. This did not happen. According to the team General Manager, Ryan Pace:

Bears Tweet 1Bears Tweet 2

Revised Personal Conduct Policy

In late 2014, the NFL teams introduced a revised Personal Conduct Policy. Aimed at addressing domestic violence and sexual assault, the NFL put their heads together to bring about new order . The hope is this new policy will increase accountability and decrease criminal acts. The policy includes funding for counseling of victims as well as violators as well as provides guidelines for independent investigative procedures.

Unfortunately, even with increased penalties, NFL players continue to break the law. The San Diego Union-Tribune keeps a running tally of arrests and citations involving NFL players. There are exactly 38 recorded arrests for crimes more harmful than a speeding ticket in 2015 alone.

ABOUT OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAW FIRM
We have the best criminal attorneys on hand to answer your calls and walk you through your individual situation 24/7.  We do our research so you can rest easy.

#1800NoCuffs
Because no one looks good in handcuffs #unlessyoureintothatsortofthing
http://www.instagram.com/1800nocuffs

Connect with Attorney Darren Kavinoky on Social Media
http://www.twitter.com/darrenkavinoky
http://www.facebook.com/darrenkavinokyfanpage

 

Some Forensic Science Found to be Less Than Scientific

A Test of Bad Forensic Science

Before the advent of DNA testing, U.S. law enforcement relied on a number of different bad forensic science techniques to connect people to crimes. Such as, handwriting samples, microscopic hair analysis, and even bite marks. As may be expected, some of these sciences are not always completely accurate.

Recently, the FBI teamed with the Department of Justice (DOJ), the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), and the Innocence Project. The teams released an announcement that they concurrently and separately reviewed microscopic hair analysis cases. The result of these cases is disconcerting. In fact, it’s downright alarming.

A Difference of Opinion

According to the FBI’s press release:

“FBI microscopic hair analysts committed widespread, systematic error, grossly exaggerating the significance of their data under oath with the consequence of unfairly bolstering the prosecutions’ case.”

As Slate Magazine so aptly puts it: “The FBI faked an entire field of forensic science.” The result is, according to University of Virginia law professor Brandon L. Garrett, a “mass disaster.

The “faked,” or bad forensic science involved microscopic examinations of hair found at the scene of a crime, as well as the hair of a suspect. In fact, this was a common practice of law enforcement for nearly thirty years. That is, until 2000, when the FBI started examining full DNA rather than just the hair itself. The DNA analysis works much better.

In reality, the microscopic hair examination technique barely worked at all, if ever. Even the Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community called the practice “highly unreliable.” Nonetheless, FBI forensic experts commonly testified in trial that the technique not only worked, but was enough to prove a suspect’s guilt.

Too Many Defendants

According to the FBI’s own report, too many scientists miscalculated the results. Twenty-six out of twenty-eight forensic scientists in the microscopic hair comparison unit “overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors.”

After examining hair found at a crime scene, the scientists compare it to a suspect’s hair in a lab. Upon finding similarities between the two, the forensic scientists often claimed the hairs matched. Unfortunately, these findings made their way to their expert witness” testimony during trial.

This similarity/match testimony happened at a staggering rate. Of the cases that the FBI reviewed to date, 90% of the cases apply. This affected 284 defendants at their trials. This is poor, bad forensic science.

Many of the convicted defendants privy to the unfortunate microscopic hair analysis are serving jail time for felony offenses. For some, the impact was irreversible. According to the FBI’s press release,

“defendants in at least 35 of these cases received the death penalty and errors were identified in 33 of those cases… Nine of these defendants have already been executed.”

The FBI is taking steps to right their wrong. They are notifying affected defendants and allowing federal defendants to make appeals. Normally, this type of practice is not allowed in federal court. However, most of the defendants in question received state court convictions. It is now up to the states to allow these cases to reexamine these cases.

The Kavinoky Law Firm is closely monitoring the situation in California. If you believe bad forensic science practices impacted your freedom, speak with a criminal defense attorney at 1.800.NO.CUFFS. all 24/7, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.

Domestic Violence Accusations and Defense in California

domestic violenceDomestic violence is sometimes called domestic abuse or intimate partner abuse. Under California law, it involved a broad range of legal violations. These include:

  1. Causing or attempting to cause bodily injury, and/or
  2. Sexual assault.

Perpetrators of Abuse

In these cases, the recipient of the violence may or may not fall into a specific category. Such categories may include such relationships as a:

  1. spouse,
  2. former spouse,
  3. relationship partner (person one is dating),
  4. cohabitant (person with whom one is living),
  5. former cohabitant (person with whom one used to live), and/or
  6. person with whom one had a child.

Domestic violence (DV) can involve physical injury, or another consideration includes threatening words.

The legal definition of an “intimate partner” for purposes of DV includes husbands or wives, boyfriends or girlfriends, and same-sex partners. Therefore, any intimate partner, no matter the sex, can be a victim of domestic abuse. The law is very broad in terms about the relationship that gives rise to domestic violence.

What is Abuse?

Similar to “intimate partner,” the term “abuse” is also very broad.

Each of the following actions, among others, can lead to prosecution for domestic violence or intimate partner violence:

  • hitting,
  • slapping,
  • punching,
  • kicking,
  • threatening with or without a weapon,
  • hitting with an object,
  • hair pulling,
  • burning,
  • cutting,
  • biting,
  • stabbing, and/or
  • stalking

Given these points, keep in mind, there is no scale for pain or abuse. No matter how slight the physical touching, the perpetrator of the action is still eligible for prosecution. Some types of domestic violence charges do not even require any physical touching.  In fact, stalking or criminal threats do not involve touch (Penal Code section 422).

California Penal Code Convictions

California Penal Code section 273.5 is the most frequent domestic violence crime.

This penal code section provides that anyone who willfully inflicts injury on a spouse, former spouse, or certain other people is guilty of a felony.  Of course, Penal Code 273.5 is explicit that the injury may be either minor or serious in nature, so long as it is caused by physical force.  The punishment for those guilty of violating this crime includes up to one year in county jail. Moreover, the perpetrator may face even up to six years in state prison. Additionally, a conviction for someone who has had prior domestic violence conviction means even more time.

Prosecution of DV cases involves a very serious approach. Moreover, the cases often find their way to the District Attorney’s desk. These attorneys specifically handle domestic violence cases and likewise carry intense knowledge.

Your intimate partner does not decide whether or not to press charges in a domestic violence case in California. Once the police are involved in the domestic violence situation, you and your intimate partner no longer have the choice of whether or not to prosecute. The decision of whether or not to file criminal charges in a domestic violence case is up to the prosecutor alone. He or she will decide whether or not to bring the domestic violence charge. It is incorrect (and dangerous) to believe that the DV victim has the power to press charges or not; once law enforcement is involved, it is out of their hands.

California Domestic Violence Defense Attorney

No matter what charges you are currently facing, a skilled California criminal defense attorney can help. There are defenses for every criminal charge. In most cases, these domestic violence charges are based on one person’s word.

A domestic violence criminal defense lawyer understands that there are two sides to every story. This lawyer can help you gather evidence and proof for your side of the story. Do not think that these charges are hopeless. Speak with an experienced criminal defense attorney today to learn how you can save your reputation and keep your record clean.

Do not hesitate to call on criminal defense lawyer Darren T. Kavinoky if you would like a FREE case evaluation.

Domestic Violence and Divorce in California

Domestic violence accusations are common during a divorce. Some are accurate, some are less than accurate.

22% of divorces today end due to a claim of violence in the relationship. Additionally, 3 million women a year are victims of partner abuse. With this consideration, however, some partners make exaggerated or misleading claims of violence. Unfortunately, some see these claims as a way to gain advantage in divorce and/or custody proceedings.  Many partners lose access to their children as a result of false domestic violence charges. However, with an expert criminal defense attorney on your side, so shall the truth be with your case.

Domestic violence accusations can majorly impact divorce proceedings. Regardless if it is an allegation, arrest or conviction, accusations are impactful.  This is true particularly when it comes to child custody issues. This is a serious danger for all partners processing divorce. However, it is especially harmful for those in the military. A conviction of domestic violence during a divorce will affect child custody and the outcome of a divorce. Unfortunately, it can also cost military personnel their jobs.

While domestic violence is a real issue in many divorce cases, sometimes the accusations are false.

Divorcing couples are often involved in messy disputes. Some cases lead to an angry spouse claiming abuse out of frustration. If you believe you’ve been falsely accused of spousal abuse, do not wait. It’s crucial to seek the help of a qualified legal counsel who will work to protect your rights.

Protective Orders

Also referred to as restraining orders, protective orders are popular grants during a divorce. If granted, a partner may not be able to see his/her children. The accused is likely not able to enter his/her own home or visit his/her children. In some cases, those with restraining orders against them may also find themselves with additional responsibilities. He or she may need to attend counseling or anger management classes.

A parent with a restraining order against him or her will likely have a difficult time fighting for custody and visitation rights to his children. In some cases, restraining orders may last for several years after the divorce. If a partner violates an active protection or restraining order, he can go to jail.

Criminal Charges

An arrest for domestic violence in the state of California may result in criminal charges. A conviction on your record can affect you for years to come. The safest course of action for men accused of domestic violence is to remain calm and obey all restraining orders for the time being. If the accused respects the boundaries of the restraining order, there is hope to drop the charges. Of course, if an expert criminal defense attorney proves the allegations are false, the restraining order is no longer valid.

Domestic Violence Act

As a man with false allegations of domestic violence made against you, it’s imperative that you understand the Domestic Violence Act. Implemented in 1979, the act defines what constitutes domestic violence. According to the legislation, domestic violence is defined as “attempts to cause or intentionally causing bodily injury, and placing a person in fear of ‘imminent serious bodily injury’ by threatening the use of force.” Under the act, it’s easy for women to make false allegations but, with the right criminal defense, you may be able to prove your innocence and protect your rights.

Domestic violence charges can result in severe legal consequences for defendants, including eviction, heavy fines and legal fees, and a permanent mark on your criminal record. Additionally, these charges can affect alimony and child custody. Some courts prevent parents with a history of physical abuse from visiting their children, even under supervision. Some of the normal privileges you’ve grown accustomed to throughout the years may be taken away from you as a result of a false domestic violence charge.

Don’t Fight Alone

During a divorce, things can get ugly. Don’t fight this battle alone. If you find yourself standing on the wrong side of a restraining order, call The Kavinoky Law Firm. We hire only the best attorneys in Los Angeles. We work around the clock to protect your rights. 1.800.No.Cuffs is the number to remember but hope you never need.

Drug Expungement

drug expungementDrug expungement is a popular option for those who worry about life after conviction. It’s not a perfect solution for everyone, but it’s a great option to consider. An experienced criminal defense attorney can help you work towards expungement.

A drug charge may keep you from living your life the way you desire. From getting a good job and earning more money to purchasing a home, criminal convictions are no fun. Today, more than 80 percent of employers conduct background checks. Consequently, in today’s volatile job market, a drug charge can make job hunts a challenge. Even if you pass a drug test, the challenge persists.

Expungement refers to the process of sealing arrest and conviction records. Once an arrest is no longer on your record, potential employers or landlords have the right to its disclosure. In turn, it’s relatively easy to expunge your California criminal record. If you are eligible, your record can be clear very quickly.

Expungement Eligibility

There are certain entry requirements to meet if you’re looking for a drug expungement. The list is as follows:

  1. Any mandatory drug treatment is complete,
  2. Probation is complete, and
  3. Any other punishments related to the drug charge completed.

If you meet all of the above requirements, you are eligible for expungement in California. This process, if approved will set your conviction aside or dismissed entirely.

Once California releases your conviction, the crime is no longer on your record. As a result, you’re free from all penalties and disabilities resulting from the conviction. Additionally, you don’t have to answer ‘yes’ on criminal history questions on job applications. Truly, it’s as if the crime did not happen.

Other Rights After Expungement

Although a conviction disappears via expungement, not all rights are the same after a conviction. Regardless of expungement, some rights are revoked indefinitely.

One example is the right to possess a firearm. This right will not restore after expungement. Additionally, you must disclose your criminal history in any application for public office or a position as a peace officer. You must also disclose it for licensure by any state or local agency, or when contracting with the California State Lottery. Lastly, you must disclose when serving on a jury.

Keep in mind, your disclosure should not hurt you. Legally, the disclosure of a conviction cannot in any way result in the denial of employment or benefits.

Denial of Expungement

Certain convictions are not eligible for expungement consideration. Firstly, you may not expunge your conviction if you served your sentence in state prison. Also, depending on the severity of the crime, some just may not be up for clearance. Under California state law, some crimes are more heinous than others. These crimes include serious sex offenses committed against children. Additionally, in some cases, murder and other violent crimes are not eligible.

Expungement Process

Before the court will grant you a drug expungement, there are several steps you and your criminal defense attorney must follow. These include:

  1. Analyzing the case to determine you are eligible for an expungement,
  2. Performing legal research regarding the current and relevant law,
  3. Filing the appropriate paperwork within the proper time frames, and
  4. Attending the hearing in court.

Even if you follow these steps, and the judge grants you a drug expungement, there may still be limitations as to what an expungement can do for you. Expunged convictions can still be used as prior convictions in order to enhance sentencing for future crimes, and can be used as a ‘strike’ for the purposes of California’s three strikes law.

In most cases, juvenile offenders and those who have been arrested or convicted for drug crimes may have an easier time expunging their criminal history. It’s important to note that possession of marijuana for personal use should automatically be erased from your criminal record after two years – this does not apply to convictions for growing, selling, or transporting marijuana.

Hire a Lawyer 

The Kavinoky Law firm hires the best criminal defense attorneys in California. Our excellent and experienced attorneys work hard to fight for their clients’ rights. If you find yourself on the wrong side of the law, call 1.800.No.Cuffs for a free consultation. 

Find a DUI Lawyer Near Me

Civil penalties for stalking one’s intimate partner in California

Civil penalties for stalking one’s intimate partner in California

Stalking, as defined by California’s domestic violence laws, is when an individual maliciously and willfully follows or harasses and threatens his or her intimate partner with the intent to place that partner in fear for his or her safety. If convicted of this crime, the defendant faces up to one year in the county jail and up to a $1,000 fine if convicted of a misdemeanor or up to one year in the state prison if convicted of a felony. Both a misdemeanor and a felony conviction carry additional penalties, but jail or prison is generally the defining characteristic of a criminal sentence.

Civil penalties may also face an individual accused of stalking his or her intimate partner. Both civil and criminal punishment may be sought against the offender and are not mutually exclusive, which means that an individual accused of stalking may face both civil penalties and criminal prosecution.

The major differences between a civil suit and criminal prosecution for D.V. related stalking are found in the title and role of the accuser, in the “burden of proof” and in the penalties. In a civil case, the victim (who becomes known as the plaintiff) sues the defendant for the “tort” of stalking. In a criminal court, it is the prosecutor who actually files the charge, despite the common misconception that it is the victim who “presses charges.”

The “burden of proof” is the standard that the prosecutor or plaintiff’s attorney must meet to prevail. In a criminal case, the prosecutor must prove that the defendant is guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt,” which is the highest burden. In a civil case, the plaintiff must only prove that the defendant is liable by a “preponderance of the evidence,” which means that it is more likely than not that the defendant stalked his or her intimate partner. Although the burden of proof is higher in a criminal trial, a civil trial requires more evidence. For example, a criminal charge for stalking an intimate partner can be filed based only on the accusation of the victim, yet in a civil trial for stalking, the plaintiff must support his or her allegations with independent corroborating evidence. Another example is that in a criminal case, there is no requirement that the victim asked the offender to stop his or her behavior, but in order to file a civil suit, the plaintiff must have clearly and definitively told the defendant to stop the stalking, unless the defendant was already under court order to refrain from such behavior.

Finally, the penalties in a civil suit and in a criminal prosecution are different. A civil suit penalizes the defendant financially whereas a criminal case can result in jail or prison. A plaintiff sues in civil court for two things – money and sometimes protection. In a stalking case, both would be sought. If a defendant is found liable, he or she could be required to pay the plaintiff “general” damages (damages that are awarded when an exact dollar amount can’t be calculated, an example being pain and suffering), “special” damages (out of pocket expenses for attorney’s fees, hospital bills, counseling, damage to personal property, etc.) and “punitive” damages, which are awarded above and beyond general and special damages to punish the defendant for stalking his or her intimate partner. In addition, if the defendant were found liable, his or her intimate partner would receive a civil protective order that would prohibit further stalking or other types of abuse by the defendant.

Stalking is a serious matter, whether charged criminally or alleged in a civil suit. It is therefore imperative that the accused hires the best attorneys he or she can afford. The criminal defense lawyers at the Kavinoky Law Firm specialize in intimate partner abuse crimes and have successfully represented numerous individuals charged with stalking their intimate partners. Contact them today for a free consultation and/or to ask for a referral for a civil attorney.

The consequences of a California domestic violence stalking conviction

The consequences of a California domestic violence stalking conviction

Domestic violence laws, in California, are applicable to all crimes that are committed against one’s intimate partner. Intimate partners are people who have children together, who live together, who are dating or formerly dating and who are married or divorced. The partners may be heterosexual or homosexual. It therefore follows that an individual who follows or harasses and threatens his or her intimate partner, intending to place that partner in fear, will be charged with stalking as a domestic abuse crime. Depending on the circumstances that surrounded the charge, D.V. stalking can be charged as a misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in the county jail and/or a maximum $1,000 fine or as a felony, punishable by up to one year in prison. Aggravating factors and/or prior convictions will likely result in mandatory prison time for as many as six years.

Imprisonment is perhaps the most frightening part of a sentence, but it is certainly not the extent of what a defendant convicted of intimate partner stalking faces. A defendant who is convicted of any intimate partner abuse crime will usually be placed on probation (which can be informal if charged with a misdemeanor or formal if charged with a felony). Probation generally remains in effect for at least three years. While on probation for a DV related offense, the defendant will have several mandatory terms of probation with which he or she must comply. These terms include, but are not limited to, enrollment and attendance in a batterer’s class, fines payable to specific domestic violence funds, a protective order issued against the defendant and the booking process.

Penalties for an individual convicted of stalking an intimate partner also include counseling, in addition to enrollment in a batterer’s class and possible confinement in a state hospital if the court decides that the defendant would benefit from treatment due to a possible mental illness. Perhaps the most devastating consequence of a domestic violence stalking conviction is that the defendant may be required to register as a sex offender if the court finds that the defendant stalked his or her intimate partner as a result of sexual compulsion or for the purpose of sexual gratification. If the court finds that registration is appropriate, the defendant must register for life and will face additional penalties, including jail or prison time, if he or she doesn’t comply with all of the requirements that coincide with registration.

Professional licensing restrictions may also face a defendant convicted of stalking his or her intimate partner if it can be proven that the stalking was somehow substantially related to the defendant’s job duties. This means that a conviction could potentially end an individual’s career. Along these same lines, firearm restrictions will be imposed upon a stalking arrest and will remain in effect if the defendant is convicted of the charge. Such a restriction could potentially end an individual’s career if that person must carry a firearm as a part of his or her job.

Civil penalties may also face an individual convicted of stalking his or her intimate partner, as the victim may also sue the defendant in civil court for monetary damages and a civil harassment order.

Clearly, the penalties facing a defendant convicted of stalking his or her intimate partner who was prosecuted under California’s intimate partner violence laws are severe and life altering. One’s freedom and reputation is too important to trust to an inexperienced attorney. The criminal defense lawyers at the Kavinoky Law Firm specialize in domestic abuse crimes and have successfully defended countless individuals who have been charged with stalking their intimate partners. The attorneys excel in preparing the most comprehensive defense strategies and will aggressively advocate for alternative sentencing when appropriate. Click here for a free consultation and for the best representation.

Alternative Sentencing and Its Effect on a California Criminal Threats Domestic Violence Conviction

Alternative Sentencing and Its Effect on a California Criminal Threats Domestic Violence Conviction

“Criminal threats” is classified as a California domestic violence crime when an individual threatens to commit a crime against his or her intimate partner that would result in death or serious bodily injury if committed. Intimate partners are married, divorced, dating, were formerly dating, living together or have children together. These intimate partners may be heterosexual or same-sex partnerships. If, as a result of the threat, the recipient reasonably fears for his or her safety, his or her intimate partner may be charged with criminal threats as a domestic abuse crime. If convicted, the accused faces up to one year in the county jail or state prison, depending on whether the charge was filed as a misdemeanor or as a felon.

Although imprisonment is the stated penalty for making criminal threats against one’s intimate partner, there are alternative sentencing options that an experienced criminal defense lawyer may be able to convince a judge that would better serve the interests of justice. The unparalleled attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm keep current with all of the different sentencing options that are available to their clients who have been convicted of intimate partner abuse charges so that they can effectively advocate for their imposition as an alternative to jail or prison.

Alternative sentencing comprises a variety of options that serve as alternatives to incarceration. The most common types of alternative sentencing that may be imposed in a conviction for making criminal threats against one’s intimate partner in a Domestic Violence case include probation, electronic monitoring, house arrest, community service or labor, counseling in either an individual or group setting, and paying restitution to the intimate partner when possible. These options are by no means the entirety but are the most frequently used alternatives to serving jail or prison time. Depending on which alternative is sought, a skilled attorney may be able to convince the court that alternative sentencing will be more effective in acting as a deterrent to future criminal conduct, as the requested alternative may have a rehabilitative element to it, as opposed to imprisonment which only serves to punish.

When considering whether to impose an alternative sentence to jail or prison, a judge will take into account several factors. The court will want to know whether drugs and/or alcohol were involved in the charged incident or are regularly used by the defendant, whether there were any mitigating or extenuating circumstances that led to the commission of the crime, and whether the defendant suffers from any mental illness. An experienced lawyer knows what facts and circumstances are likely to persuade a judge that alternative sentencing is a more appropriate penalty than jail or prison and will advocate for his or her client accordingly.

A California domestic abuse charge such as “criminal threats” jeopardizes an individual’s reputation, career, family and freedom the minute the accusation is made, especially when a jail or prison sentence awaits. Alternative sentencing can make all the difference, which is why it is imperative that an individual facing a criminal threats charge hires an attorney who is familiar with available sentencing alternatives and knows how to effectively argue for their application. The outstanding attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm will do their best to help keep their clients out of jail or prison by proposing creative alternative sentencing options that meet each client’s needs. A skilled defense lawyer can explain the complexities of a California criminal threats prosecution during a free consultation.

Defenses to Violating a Protective Order

Defenses to Violating a Protective Order

There are many effective defense strategies available to fight California domestic violence charges such as violation of a protective order. Protective orders are issued by courts in domestic abuse cases to bar offenders from engaging in specific acts of abuse, re-entering their own homes, or behaving in certain ways.

Any intimate partner can be charged with a California domestic abuse offense, including straight or gay individuals who are married, divorced, living together, have children together, or who are dating or were formerly dating.

Any intentional and knowing violation of a protective order by an individual against his or her intimate partner is a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum penalty of one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. If the violation results in physical injury to the alleged victim, the offender will serve mandatory jail time of at least 30 days, possibly up to one year, and the fine may rise to $2,000. California courts may even punish an offender for violating an order in California that was issued in another state.

The good news is that there are many effective defenses in domestic abuse cases. In an effort to acquit the accused, a good defense attorney will employ as many defenses as he or she can, which all include a thorough review of the facts, witness preparation and effective cross-examination. Altercations between intimate partners are emotional, highly charged incidents that can be interpreted in more than one way. A skilled criminal defense lawyer will ensure that the defendant’s version of events is not only heard by the jury, but believed as well.

Because injury is not a requirement when charging an individual with violating a protective order, any physical evidence and/or eyewitness testimony that supports or negates the charge can be critical to either party. Depending on the circumstances, a good defense lawyer will attempt to either discredit both or alternatively make them favorable to the defense. Similarly, if the protected party sustains no injury and there is no documented proof of the violation or any credible eyewitnesses to the violation, the defense attorney may argue that there is insufficient evidence to prosecute the defendant. A skilled attorney will also know how to address mitigating circumstances that may either reduce or negate the charge. These are just some of the reasons why it is so important to have professional legal representation experienced in this area of the law.

Some other defenses to this crime include legality (was the protective order issued for a lawful purpose?) and knowledge (did the defendant actually know the order existed and have the opportunity to read and/or understand its contents?). Self-defense or the defense of others could be a possible defense, depending on the circumstances surrounding the alleged violation. When an experienced domestic violence attorney reviews the facts of the case, he or she knows how to spot the issues that could ultimately defend his or her client and how to most effectively present them to the court.

Domestic violence statistics reveal that many couples who are involved in an abusive relationship are both victims and both abusers. This means that an accused may also be the victim of his or her intimate partner’s abuse and should not legally bear sole responsibility for the alleged incident. Another example of this power struggle (which is also another common defense) is when the protected party (or so-called “victim”) makes false allegations. A skilled defense attorney knows how to effectively cross-examine a “victim” to prove that the allegations were indeed false and initiated out of anger, jealousy or revenge.

An intimate partner abuse charge such as violating a protective order jeopardizes the defendant’s reputation, livelihood and freedom. In an aggressive effort to acquit their clients, the knowledgeable defense attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm will effectively communicate these defenses to the judge and jury. An experienced defense lawyer can outline an aggressive strategy to defend California domestic violence charges during a free consultation.

Domestic violence counseling

Domestic violence counseling

In California, when a defendant is convicted on a domestic violence charge, he or she will usually be sentenced to a batterer’s class as a condition of probation. The classes that the court requires are held once a week for a year, although anyone can attend more frequently. These classes are geared towards people who need treatment to help manage their anger and violent outbreaks. With respect to abusers, the goal of counseling is to help them learn to walk away from potentially explosive situations without resorting to violence. To achieve this goal, counselors encourage the abusers to examine their lives to better understand the reasons why they succumb to violent outbursts. If successful, the batterer learns that he or she cannot control his or her relationships through violence.

In addition to mandating a batterer’s class, if the court finds evidence that the defendant was using alcohol or drugs at the time of the violent episode (which, according to domestic violence statistics, is often the case), it may order that the defendant additionally attend a specified number of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) or Narcotics Anonymous (NA) meetings which are free of charge.

Experienced criminal defense lawyers like those at The Kavinoky Law Firm are sympathetic to what their clients are going through when charged with intimate partner abuse. They have successfully defended countless California domestic abuse cases, treating each client with respect and compassion. In situations where the defendant was placed on probation, they helped ensure that their client followed through with each condition of probation so that he or she would ultimately be able to apply to have their criminal conviction expunged. They have many resources available to them to aid their clients in fulfilling their probationary conditions as conveniently as possible.

Counseling is also available to victims of domestic abuse. Victims of intimate partner violence require special care and treatment. Services frequently include private or group therapy, vocational training, and lessons on how a victim can safely flee from a violent partner. The goal of this therapy is to empower the victim to leave an abusive relationship behind in order to secure his or her safety and the safety of involved children.

Oftentimes the accused has also been the victim of abuse by his or her partner. Domestic violence statistics reveal that many couples who are involved in an abusive relationship are both abusers and both victims. This fact applies to both men and women involved in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. When such is the case, it is important that the accused also receives counseling as a victim. The caring attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm become closely involved with their clients to make sure they are receiving all appropriate outside assistance. They have referrals for all types of counseling services, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, and they will ensure that their client is referred to an appropriate class where his or her native language is spoken.

Being arrested on a California domestic abuse charge is a serious matter with serious consequences. Trying to navigate this very technical and complex area of the law without the best legal representation is a mistake that can have devastating consequences. Hiring a skilled attorney from The Kavinoky Law Firm as soon as possible after a domestic violence arrest is imperative to a successful defense. Click here for a free consultation.