The types of child abuse that will be prosecuted under California’s domestic violence laws

Child abuse, defined under California’s domestic violence laws, is any abuse, including physical, sexual, emotional abuse or neglect, that is directed as one’s child, under the age of 18, whether the child is personally the victim of the abuse or whether he or she is a witness to the abuse that is taking place in his or her home.

Child abuse is, unfortunately, a rapidly growing problem in this country and California is among the toughest states on child abusers. It exists in all parts of the country and occurs in homes regardless of the race, religion or economic status of its residents. Both homosexual couples and same-sex partnerships are guilty of abusing their children and its effects on children are overwhelmingly devastating.

Physical child abuse will be prosecuted as a California crime of domestic abuse when an individual intentionally inflicts an injury upon his or her child. About 25% of all of the confirmed cases of child abuse in this country involve physical abuse. Incidents of physical abuse generally occur when a parent is stressed and unable to control his or her impulses, which leads the parent or her to strike his or her child, oftentimes without consideration for his or her consequences. Other times, a child may become the victim of physical abuse if he or she tries to intervene to protect a parent who is being abused. Unfortunately, due to an adult’s size and strength, a parent may unintentionally severely injure or even kill his or her child during a moment of rage. Sadly, many parents who abuse their children were also abused as children and don’t realize that physical punishment is an inappropriate form of discipline.

Child sexual abuse will be treated as a D.V. crime when an activity is either performed on one’s child or performed in front of one’s child that is for the sexual gratification of the parent. It includes, but isn’t limited to, sexual touching or intercourse, allowing one’s child to watch pornography and persuading one’s child to expose his or her sexual organs.

Emotional abuse will be charged as a DV crime when one rejects, criticizes, terrorizes, ignores or isolates his or her child. Although emotional abuse is the third highest form of reported child abuse, following physical abuse and neglect, it is believed to be vastly underreported because it is difficult to prove and is usually seen in connection with other types of abuse. Emotional abuse, when directed at one’s child, can be one of the most destructive types of abuse that a child can suffer. Children who are consistently shamed, rejected or ignored suffer at least as much pain as a child who is physically abused and, most likely, even more. A child who is emotionally abused by his or her parent will often display destructive behavior, may engage in drug and/or substance abuse, will have a difficult time establishing relationships with others, will withdraw, will suffer from poor self-esteem and may ultimately even attempt suicide.

Neglect is a type of child endangerment that exists when a parent fails to satisfy his or her child’s basic needs. The neglect can vary and may include a parent not providing supervision, shelter, food or clothing, a parent ignoring his or her child’s emotional or psychological needs (for example, permitting drug and/or alcohol abuse in the home which is witnessed by the child) or a parent failing to ensure that his or her child receives proper schooling and medical treatment when necessary.

The penalties for domestic violence related child abuse are severe and may have life changing consequences for everyone involved. The offender faces child custody issues, significant jail or prison time and many other requirements that are imposed in an effort to both punish and rehabilitate the individual. To help keep these possibilities from becoming a reality, contact the criminal defense lawyers at the Kavinoky Law Firm today for a free consultation.

Eyewitness Accounts and Infliction of Injury

Infliction of injury, more commonly called “spousal abuse,” is a California domestic violence crime that applies to intimate partners. These partners may be heterosexual or homosexual and married or divorced, living together or formerly living together, or have children in common. If an individual willfully inflicts any injury, no matter how minor, upon the body of an intimate partner, he or she can be charged with a felony, punishable by up to four years in prison and a fine of up to $6,000. This charge can be brought against a defendant even if he or she barely touched the intimate partner.

Because of the intimate nature of domestic abuse, most violent situations occur outside the presence of witnesses. As a result, many infliction of injury cases are based on “he said, she said” allegations. Eyewitnesses, therefore, play a vital role in helping to prove or disprove an alleged victim’s charge of abuse.

The job of an eyewitness is to simply tell the judge and/or jury what he or she saw with no inherent bias. Easily said, rarely done. Eyewitnesses almost always have a bias either for or against one of the parties, depending on his or her relationship with them. As a result, the truth generally gets lost in translation.

There is a common misconception that a witness testifies for either the prosecution or the defense, but that is truly not the case. Since both parties have a chance to examine the witness, witnesses essentially testify for both parties. A skilled criminal defense lawyer knows how to take an eyewitness who is presented by the prosecution and turn him or her into a witness who ultimately helps prove the defendant’s version of the events. Similarly, a good defense attorney will invest time in preparing an eyewitness that he or she intends to “put on the stand” in order to try to make sure that he or she is comfortable with answering questions and to ensure that the witness doesn’t get tripped up by the prosecutor’s cross-examination.

Infliction of injury cases are usually based on a highly charged, emotional incident that unfortunately took a turn for the worse. This means that even if there was an eyewitness to the abuse, that individual may not have witnessed all the events that led to the charged incident and may not have the accurate back-story on what took place before the charged incident. It is the attorney’s job to make sure that this type of information gets relayed to the jury. The experienced attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm have successfully defended countless individuals who faced infliction of injury charges. They are familiar with all aspects of California’s intimate partner abuse laws and know how to skillfully examine witnesses in ways that are beneficial to their clients. In conjunction with their private investigators, the attorneys not only interview all witnesses but also check the criminal history of each witness to uncover any past conduct that could be considered relevant in weighing that witness’s credibility. A knowledgeable attorney will effectively cross-examine witnesses in an infliction of injury case to bring out and highlight discrepancies in their accounts that may otherwise be overlooked.

An eyewitness could potentially be the “kiss of death” to a defendant facing a domestic abuse charge. When facing an infliction of injury charge (especially when there was an eyewitness), it becomes even more critical for the accused to hire an attorney who is competent and experienced in handling witness preparation and who excels in cross-examination. The attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm know how to handle diverse witnesses under a variety of circumstances. Keeping the jury in mind, they know when it is appropriate to examine a witness with care and compassion and they know when it is appropriate to “take the gloves off” to aggressively attack. They are in it to win! Don’t hesitate to contact them today. Click here for a free consultation and for the best representation.

DNA Evidence in a Violation of a Protective Order Case

Violation of a protective order is a California domestic violence offense that can be charged against an intimate partner. The term “intimate partners” includes every type of couple – straight, gay, married, divorced, cohabiting, individuals with children in common, or who are currently or were formerly dating.

Anyone who intentionally and knowingly violates a protective order in a California domestic abuse case can be charged with a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of one year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Protective orders issued by the court prohibit the offender from engaging in specific acts of abuse, re-entering his or her own home or even behaving in a specified way. California courts even punish domestic violence defendants for violating orders in California that was issued in other states. If the violation results in physical injury to the alleged victim, the offender will serve mandatory jail time of at least 30 days and the fine may rise to $2,000.

Unfortunately, there are many partners who are involved in mutually abusive relationships. This means that both partners are victims and abusers. In these troubling relationships, both partners will exert their power in a number of ways. One of the common ways that a partner will do this is by making a false allegation. An example of this is when the self-proclaimed “victim” accuses his or her partner of violating a protective order when he or she actually didn’t.

In a case alleging physical injury to the protected party or in a case where there may be some physical evidence, such as a letter, DNA evidence can play a vital role. When charged with violating a court order, it is important to hire an attorney who is experienced with all of the evidentiary issues that often arise in connection with this crime. The skilled criminal defense lawyers at The Kavinoky Law Firm receive ongoing training in intimate partner abuse trial strategies and evidentiary issues, such as DNA evidence, giving them a leg up on the competition.

In criminal courts throughout this country, DNA evidence is playing a larger role than ever before in helping to convict the guilty and to clear the falsely accused. DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evidence is particular to each individual and remains constant throughout one’s life. Virtually every cell in the body contains DNA and it is the same in each cell, whether it is found in one’s hair, saliva, blood, skin tissue or bone. This evidence is so powerful because, with the exception of identical twins, no two people share the same DNA. This means that if DNA can be collected from a crime scene, it can either link the accused to the crime or exclude the accused from the crime. For example, in a violation of a protective order case, if the defendant’s DNA evidence, such as saliva, blood or skin tissue, is found on the protected party’s body or clothes, or on a letter written to the protected party, it will be easier to assess blame to the accused. However, if someone else’s DNA is found on the alleged victim or on any other physical evidence, it may be easier to clear the suspect and possibly look at bringing a criminal charge against the “victim” for filing a false police report.

DNA evidence is clearly here to stay. Having an attorney who is well versed in DNA evidence and the ways that it can be admitted into and excluded from evidence in a domestic abuse case is of the utmost importance, especially when facing potential jail or prison time in connection with a conviction for violating a protective order. The knowledgeable attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm have experience with this complex and technical area of the law. An experienced lawyer can outline an effective defense strategy during a free consultation.

Hearsay and 911 Calls in a Sexual Battery Case

Sexual battery is a domestic violence offense that can be charged against any intimate partner in a California domestic abuse case. The term “intimate partners” is defined very broadly under California domestic violence law – the partners can be gay or straight, married, divorced, currently or formerly living together, have children together, or be dating or formerly dating.

Touching an intimate partner against that person’s will for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification or sexual abuse can result in a sexual battery charge. Any physical contact – however slight – can be considered touching, even if it occurs through the clothing of either partner. Even an individual involved in an ongoing relationship can face sexual battery charges. Depending on the circumstances, the crime can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony with penalties of up to one-year in jail or up to four years in prison and fines of up to $10,000.

With such severe consequences, a sexual battery charge is no joke. That is why it is imperative for the accused to hire an attorney who is knowledgeable not only with respect to California domestic abuse crimes but with the types of evidentiary issues that frequently arise during these types of trials. The experienced criminal defense lawyers at the Kavinoky Law Firm have successfully defended countless individuals in sexual battery cases because they receive ongoing training and education about intimate partner abuse cases and the issues that commonly surround these types of cases. They know how to argue for admission or exclusion of hearsay and 911 evidence to provide the most effective defense for their clients.

“Hearsay” is a legal term that refers to statements that were made out of court that are later offered in court as evidence of their truth. Although hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible in criminal proceedings, there are exceptions to that rule, and intimate partner violence cases are one of those exceptions. Under California law, hearsay statements, including 911 telephone calls, are relevant in domestic abuse cases. This exception admits into evidence statements made by the complaining witness at the time when he or she was experiencing or witnessing the violent act or acts that are the subject of the case.

The rationale behind this exception is that the spontaneity of such statements and the lack of opportunity for reflection and deliberate fabrication provide an adequate guarantee of their trustworthiness. Clearly this isn’t the case in reality, as many 911 calls have been placed under false pretenses and based on underlying motives such as anger, revenge and jealousy. Nonetheless, these statements are admissible into evidence and, in a vigorous effort to convict the defendant, the prosecutor will seek to have the investigating officer read the alleged victim’s statements to the jury and will also ask the judge to play the recorded 911 call for the jury. However, even the exceptions have exceptions, which is why it is so important to have professional legal representation that is familiar with this area of the law.

Because of the highly complex and technical rules (and exceptions to those rules) that come into play in a California intimate partner abuse case, having a skilled and qualified defense lawyer who knows how to exclude or downplay this type of evidence is critical. The attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm have both the knowledge and experience to aggressively tackle any issue that may arise in a sexual battery case. Whether the allegation stems from an intense, emotional dispute that took a turn for the worse, from a false report, or from a simple mistake, professional guidance can help ease a difficult situation. When things are at their worst, the attorneys from the Kavinoky Law Firm are at their best! A defense lawyer experienced in California domestic violence cases can outline a strategic defense plan during a free consultation.

Battered person’s syndrome and its effects on the accused in a California domestic violence stalking trial

Stalking, in California, will be charged as a domestic violence crime when it is committed against one’s intimate partner. Intimate partners are persons, regardless of their sexual orientation, who are married, divorced, dating, formerly dating, living together or who have children in common. When an individual willfully and maliciously follows or harasses and threatens his or her intimate partner with the intent of placing that partner in fear, he or she will be charged with stalking as a domestic abuse crime.

In an intimate partner abuse stalking trial, a recognized psychological condition known as the battered person’s syndrome, more commonly called battered woman’s syndrome, battered women’s syndrome, B.W.S. or BWS, may be introduced as evidence against the defendant to explain the victim’s behavior or actions. This condition is commonly introduced when the victim either recants his or her allegations or refuses to cooperate with or testify for the prosecution.

Battered person’s syndrome is a theory that explains why abused individuals don’t leave their abusive intimate partners. Although the theory was developed with victimized women and abusive men in mind, it applies to both heterosexual and homosexual men and women who are victimized by their intimate partners. The syndrome explains that a severely or consistently victimized person will be unable to leave his or her partner because he or she will have been conditioned to feel helpless and will feel that escape is impossible and that the abuse is inevitable. The abused partner basically blames him or herself for the abuse.

In a stalking case that was filed as an intimate partner abuse crime, the prosecutor may hire an expert witness who will testify about the effects of the battered person’s syndrome if the alleged victim either refuses to testify or changes his or her story from the original allegations that were made to the police or prosecutor. When this type of evidence is introduced, it is against the accused and basically paints a picture for the jury that the defendant has repeatedly and severely abused his or her partner. This is one reason why it is critical for a person accused of D.V. stalking to hire a criminal defense lawyer who is familiar with battered person’s syndrome, should it and its effects be introduced at trial.

The experienced attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm specialize in intimate partner violence cases and have successfully defended countless individuals charged with stalking their intimate partners. They understand the many evidentiary issues that are frequently raised in these types of trials and know what arguments to make to try to exclude evidence that is damaging to their clients and how to downplay or refute the evidence if it is admitted. They work with a team of expert witnesses who they use to rebut battered person’s syndrome when it is introduced against their clients.

Battered person’s syndrome, the prosecutor’s expert will testify, is the reason that an alleged victim has recanted or refused to cooperate. The expert will tell the judge and jury that the defendant’s intimate partner has been so abused or threatened, that he or she has recanted out of fear for what the accused would do to that partner if he or she didn’t take back or deny his or her original accusation. If that testimony is given, a skilled defense attorney will have a defense expert witness rebut that testimony by offering the judge and jury the many legitimate reasons that an alleged victim may recant his or her original accusation.

The outstanding attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm receive training about battered person’s syndrome and how it can be introduced and refuted in an intimate partner stalking case, which has helped lead to their impeccable reputation. If charged with stalking an intimate partner, click here for a free consultation.