When the police arrive

When someone is either directly involved in or witnesses a domestic violence situation and calls the police or 911, police officers will be dispatched to the scene. Before the officers even begin asking questions, they will likely make two assumptions – first, if a man and a woman are present, it was the woman who was abused and second, that whoever placed the call to the police is the “victim” and the other partner is the “abuser, batterer or offender”. Once they have made those assumptions, they will begin questioning the partners in the attempt to verify their assumptions. During this process, it is best to remain silent until an attorney is present.

In California, intimate partner abuse is taken very seriously. When the police are called to investigate a charge of domestic abuse, it is likely that someone will be arrested. Even if the individual who first called the police changes his or her mind and tells the officers that the call shouldn’t have been placed, it will not matter. Once that first call is made and the police are involved, the case takes on a life of its own and it is only the prosecuting agency and the judge who have any control over the charges. The partner who made the call cannot tell the police that he or she doesn’t wish to “press charges” or that he or she wants to “drop the charges” because that individual gave up control of the situation as soon as the police were called.

Once the police arrive they will begin asking questions to uncover the chain of events that led to the call for their help. They will most likely question each partner (and any witnesses who are present) individually and out of the presence of the other(s) to make sure that each party tells his or her side of the story. The officers will repeatedly ask the same questions in an effort in break the individual down to expose any lies or discrepancies in that individual’s account. It is generally impossible to talk one’s way out of this type of investigation and, therefore, one shouldn’t even try to do so. The best advice is to politely advise the police that an attorney must be present before questions will be answered. This is why it is imperative to contact a skilled criminal defense lawyer from The Kavinoky Law Firm immediately after the police are called to the scene.

Although it is difficult, it is critical that the partner being accused remains silent. It is human nature to try to defend oneself by explaining one’s actions, but it is essential not to reveal anything that may inadvertently be incriminating. The accused must not make any admissions, even if that means that he or she will be arrested, as one’s silence cannot be used against him or her in court.

In addition to questioning the parties, the police will conduct a visual sweep of the scene for obvious evidence of domestic violence (holes in the wall, broken furniture, visible injuries, etc.). They will also seek to remove any firearms or other weapons from the home. The officers will also give information to the “victim” about restraining orders. It is in the best interests of the suspect to remain silent throughout this investigation and to simply let the officers do their jobs. Aside from insisting upon a criminal defense attorney, silence is the best policy.

Being accused of a domestic violence offense is scary and overwhelming. Contacting a compassionate yet aggressive attorney should be the first step in the process. An attorney from The Kavinoky Law Firm will not only help the accused navigate through the justice system with ease and understanding but will also provide the best representation available. Click here for a free consultation.

Children are affected by domestic violence in a number of ways, regardless of whether they are the direct recipients of the abuse or witness abuse between their parents. Children who are raised in homes where incidents of domestic violence are commonplace have more emotional, physical and psychological problems than children who are raised in homes that are violence-free. As a result, these young victims require supportive, nurturing environments in which they can be assured that the abuse inflicted on them isn’t their fault and where they can be free to express themselves without fear.

California offers services, classes, protection and other resources for victims of child abuse and young victims who witness other acts of intimate partner abuse in their home. While dealing with a child who has been victimized can be overwhelming, the compassionate attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm can help. They have access to numerous resources for children and their parents and will give referrals for these resources that meet the individual needs of each family.

The national child abuse hotline at 1-800-4-A-CHILD or accessed on the web at www.ChildHelp.org is a great place to start for a parent trying to help his or her abused child, for an abused child or for a child at risk of being abused to seek guidance. The hotline is staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and, thanks to interpreters, over 140 languages are spoken. Childhelp offers referrals to local community resources, literature, crisis intervention and information on emergency protection issues. They offer a variety of programs, including treatment at live-in facilities, which provide therapy, medical care and on-site schooling for severely abused children. The goal of these programs (and of Childhelp in general) is to provide a nurturing environment in which self-esteem and trust can be rediscovered in a child who has been victimized by child abuse and/or other forms of domestic violence.

Resources for child abuse can be readily accessed on-line and provide information on how to recognize abuse if is it suspected, where and how to report abuse, instructions on how to obtain emergency protective orders and other local referrals, depending on where one lives.

Local children’s courts may also be able to provide a list of local resources for both parents and children who have been affected by child abuse. In addition, many of these courts have Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) that may be able to offer suggestions on where to find additional information and may be able to refer parents and their children to classes for child victims and to classes for parents that teach a parent how to deal with an abused child, to therapists who specialize in working with abused children and to other organizations that may meet a particular family’s needs.

Defense Attorneys for Child Abuse Law

If a parent or anyone else suspects that a child may be suffering from abuse, either personally or by witnessing it, that adult must take action. Contacting a criminal lawyer is a good place to start to find out what legal and/or criminal action is possible. The trusted attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm will take the time to sit down and listen to a potential client’s questions and concerns. They specialize in California domestic violence law and, as a result, have the experience and training to help an individual tackle any D.V. related problem. When things are at their worst, the attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm are at their best! To discuss a child abuse case, please click here for a free consultation.

Battered Person’s Syndrome and Infliction of Injury

Infliction of injury, more commonly called “spousal abuse,” is a California domestic violence crime that applies to intimate partners. These partners may be heterosexual or homosexual and married or divorced, living together or formerly living together or have children in common. If an individual willfully inflicts any injury, no matter how minor, upon the body of an intimate partner, he or she can be charged with a felony, punishable by up to four years in prison and a fine of up to $6,000.

In this, as well as many other intimate partner abuse cases, the condition known as “battered person’s syndrome” (more commonly called “battered women’s syndrome”) comes into play and can be offered as evidence through the testimony of an expert witness by either side. Although it usually refers to a woman, battered person’s syndrome can apply to a woman or a man involved in a heterosexual or homosexual relationship. Battered person’s syndrome is a recognized psychological condition that is used to describe someone who has been consistently and/or severely victimized by his or her partner. It is frequently used in infliction of injury cases either to defend an abused woman or man’s actions or as evidence against his or her abuser if the abused victim later recants his or her allegations. Because this syndrome is frequently introduced in a domestic abuse trial, it is vital to hire a skilled criminal defense lawyer from The Kavinoky Law Firm who is familiar with battered person’s syndrome should it and its effects be introduced into evidence.

The characteristics of this syndrome all focus on the abused believing that the violence is his or her fault. In addition, the syndrome has three distinct phases that include the “tension-building” phase, the actual battery, and the “honeymoon” phase. In order to be diagnosed with battered person’s syndrome, the abused must have gone through all three phases at least twice.

If the abused has committed a crime, battered person’s syndrome may be introduced as a defense in the case. A knowledgeable attorney will likely hire an expert witness to testify that the abused either didn’t have the criminal mental intent that was necessary to commit the crime or that he or she honestly believed that force was needed in a particular situation to avoid a more serious injury or even death. If either of these scenarios sound familiar, it is crucial to contact an attorney immediately to begin building a defense based on this syndrome.

If, however, it is the prosecution who is introducing battered person’s syndrome as evidence against a defendant, it is vital for the defendant to hire an experienced criminal defense attorney to help exclude that evidence or, at the very least, to rebut it with a defense expert witness. A defense expert witness will help discredit the prosecution’s theory that the “victim” suffers from battered person’s syndrome and will point out that the prosecution is simply using it as an excuse to bolster an otherwise weak case. The prosecution usually introduces the syndrome when the “victim” refuses to testify. The prosecutor argues, through his or her expert witness, that the “victim” is recanting the allegations because he or she fears what might happen if he or she doesn’t. A defense expert will rebut that argument, addressing the many legitimate reasons why an accuser may change his or her story.

The attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm have the training and experience to handle any infliction of injury case. They have successfully defended countless cases with skill and compassion and are well qualified to effectively tackle any and every evidentiary issue that may arise, particularly with respect to battered person’s syndrome. Click here for a free consultation and to secure the best representation available.

Professional Licensing Restrictions and Infliction of Injury

Willful infliction of injury is a California domestic violence charge, sometimes referred to as spousal abuse, which applies to intimate partners. These partners may be married or divorced, living together or formerly living together or have children in common. The laws apply to both heterosexual couples and same-sex partnerships. If an individual willfully inflicts any injury, no matter how minor, upon the body of an intimate partner, he or she can be charged with a felony, punishable by up to four years in prison and a fine of up to $6,000. A defendant can face this charge even if he or she barely touched the intimate partner.

When an individual is convicted for this domestic abuse crime, there are several mandatory penalties that will be imposed and other penalties that may be imposed. One of the possible consequences that a defendant convicted of infliction of injury may face is a restriction on his or her professional license.

Under California law, a licensing board may suspend or revoke a license if the license-holder has been convicted of a crime, if the crime is substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of the business or profession for which the license was issued. It does not matter whether the conviction was the result of a jury trial, a guilty plea, or a no contest plea. This suspension or revocation may take place once the defendant is placed on probation, once the conviction has been affirmed on appeal, or once the timeframe within which to file an appeal has ended. In addition, there are several professional licensing boards that maintain their own standards and practices related to disciplining their license-holders that may be even more restrictive.

In order to defend against a professional license restriction, it helps to have an attorney to argue against its application. An attorney has the knowledge and available resources to articulate why an infliction of injury conviction (under most circumstances) is not substantially related to the accused’s “qualifications, functions, or duties” of his or her job. In addition, the skilled attorney may recognize when the defendant’s employer is unlawfully imposing such a restriction in an effort to inappropriately fire their otherwise competent employee.

If either facing an infliction of injury charge or if recently convicted of that charge, hiring an experienced, knowledgeable criminal defense lawyer to help guard against a conviction and/or a possible professional license restriction is by far the smartest defense strategy. The skilled attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm have successfully defended countless individuals who have been charged with intimate partner abuse and have helped them keep their families, careers, freedom and dignity intact. When things are at their worst, the attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm are at their best! To discuss a potential professional licensing restriction, or any other legal matter, click here for a free consultation.

Battered Person’s Syndrome and Sexual Battery

Sexual battery is a California domestic violence crime charged against an intimate partner. Intimate partners may be heterosexual or homosexual and married, divorced, living together, have children in common, dating or formerly dating. In this, as well as many other domestic abuse cases, the condition known as “battered person’s syndrome” (more commonly called “battered women’s syndrome”) comes into play and can be offered as evidence through the testimony of an expert witness by either side.

Although it usually refers to a woman, battered person’s syndrome can apply to a woman or a man involved in a heterosexual or homosexual relationship. Battered person’s syndrome is a recognized psychological condition that is used to describe someone who has been consistently and/or severely victimized by his or her partner. It is frequently used in domestic violence cases either to defend an abused defendant’s actions or as evidence against the defendant if the abused victim later recants his or her allegations. Because this syndrome is frequently raised in intimate partner violence trials, it is vital to hire a skilled criminal defense lawyer from the Kavinoky Law Firm who is familiar with battered person’s syndrome should it and its effects be introduced into evidence.

The characteristics of this syndrome all focus on the abused believing that the violence was his or her fault. In addition, the syndrome has three distinct phases that include the “tension-building” phase, the actual battery, and the “honeymoon” phase. In order to be diagnosed with battered person’s syndrome, the abused must have gone through all three phases at least twice.

Sexual battery is referred to as a “wobbler” offense, meaning that it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the severity of the individual case. If a person touches an intimate part of another against that person’s will for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification or sexual abuse, he or she may be charged with sexual battery as a misdemeanor. “Touching” can be any physical contact – however slight – whether accomplished directly, through the clothing of the accused, or through the clothing of the accuser.

Sexual battery charges can be brought against any intimate partner, even one involved in an ongoing, intimate relationship. When charged as a misdemeanor (with no aggravating circumstances), sexual battery carries a maximum of a six-month jail sentence and a $2,000 fine. However, if the touching takes place while the accuser is unlawfully restrained, institutionalized, seriously disabled, medically incapacitated or unconscious, the jail sentence may increase to a maximum of one year or the crime may rise to a felony, punishable by a maximum of four years in the state prison and a $10,000 fine.

When the prosecution introduces battered person’s syndrome as evidence against a defendant, it is vital for the defendant to have an experienced criminal defense attorney to help exclude that evidence or, at the very least, to rebut it with a defense expert witness. A defense expert witness will help discredit the prosecution’s theory that the “victim” suffers from battered person’s syndrome and will point out that the prosecution is simply using it as a way to bolster an otherwise weak case. The prosecution usually introduces the syndrome when the “victim” refuses to testify. The prosecutor then argues that the “victim” has recanted the allegations because the victim feared what would happen if he or she didn’t. A defense expert will rebut that argument, addressing the many legitimate reasons why an accuser may change his or her story.

The attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm have the training and experience to handle any sexual battery case. They have successfully defended countless intimate partner abuse cases with skill and compassion and are well qualified to effectively tackle any and every evidentiary issue that may arise, particularly with respect to battered person’s syndrome. A skilled attorney from the Kavinoky Law Firm can provide a free consultation and outline an aggressive defense strategy designed to protect the accused partner’s rights and minimize the consequences of a sexual battery charge.

Sexual Battery Trial Considerations

Sexual battery can be charged in any California domestic violence case that involves one intimate partner touching the other for purposes of sexual gratification or abuse. The term ‘intimate partners’ include couples of the opposite and same sex who are married, divorced, living together, have children together, or who are dating or formerly dating.

“Touching” in a California sexual battery case can include any physical contact – however slight – even if it occurs through the clothing of either of the partners. This offense can even be charged against an individual involved in an ongoing relationship. Depending on the circumstances, the crime can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony with penalties of up to one-year in jail or up to four years in prison and fines of up to $10,000.

In an intimate partner abuse case, there are several evidentiary issues that frequently arise. Because the consequences of a domestic violence conviction are so severe, it is imperative that the defendant hires a criminal defense lawyer who keeps current with the latest applicable case law and cutting-edge trial strategies. The attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm have experience dealing with every aspect of a California domestic abuse case and receive ongoing training to make sure that they maintain their reputation for excellence. They know the intricacies involved in all the evidentiary issues that may arise and how to successfully use each to their client’s advantage.

The following are some of the issues that may arise in a sexual battery case:

• Battered Person’s Syndrome (more commonly called battered women’s syndrome) is a psychological condition that is used to describe someone who has been consistently and/or severely victimized by his or her partner. Although it usually refers to a woman, battered person’s syndrome can apply to a woman or a man involved in a heterosexual or homosexual relationship.
• Physical evidence can be a huge issue in a sexual battery case. Because this crime doesn’t require that the victim actually suffer an injury, sexual battery can be charged with no physical proof of the touching. Photographs or medical records showing contact or revealing injury are therefore helpful to the prosecution if and when they exist. A skilled defense attorney knows the appropriate arguments to make to try to exclude such evidence.
• DNA evidence is playing a larger role than ever before in sexual battery cases throughout the country, both to convict the guilty and to exonerate those wrongly accused or convicted.
• Recanting victims are very common in domestic abuse cases. There are a number of reasons that a victim “recants” (takes back his or her story) during a trial. Because this is so common, the prosecution usually expects that a victim will recant and knows exactly how to proceed under this type of situation.
• Eyewitness accounts can make or break a case. Either side can subpoena witnesses who were present during the charged incident. A skilled defense attorney will work with defense witnesses to make sure that they tell their version of the events in the light most favorable to the defendant. A good attorney also knows how to effectively cross-examine prosecution witnesses to highlight discrepancies in their accounts.

The prosecution frequently tries to introduce hearsay and 911 calls into the record. Unlike most criminal cases, hearsay and 911 calls are sometimes allowed into evidence in domestic violence cases. This is another reason why it is so important to have an attorney who is experienced in California domestic abuse law, as he or she knows how to effectively argue against their admission.

Domestic violence law is technical and complex, which is why it is critical to hire an attorney who is qualified, skilled and experienced in this area. Contact the unparalleled attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm for a free consultation.

Physical evidence and its role in a stalking case charged under California’s domestic violence laws

Domestic violence in California applies to all crimes that are perpetrated against one’s intimate partner. An intimate partner can be one’s spouse, former spouse, significant other, former significant other, the person with whom he or she has children or the person with which he or she lives. These laws apply to people involved in both heterosexual and homosexual relationships. When an individual maliciously harasses or follows and threatens his or her intimate partner, he or she will therefore likely be charged with stalking as a domestic abuse crime.

Since D.V. stalking doesn’t require that there be physical evidence of the crime, it can be very helpful to either the defense or the prosecution if and when it exists. Without physical evidence, a criminal defense lawyer may be able to convince a prosecutor or judge to either reduce the charge or have it dismissed altogether due to insufficient evidence. With it, a good defense attorney will know how to downplay its significance if it is damaging to his or her client or will argue against its admission.

Physical evidence in a stalking case may include evidence that the police obtain during a search of the suspect’s home or property, such as video surveillance of the intimate partner or photos taken of the intimate partner on the defendant’s camera. Physical evidence may also be given to the police by the intimate partner. Examples include audio recordings of messages that the defendant left on the intimate partner’s voice mail or telephone answering machine or copies of emails, text messages or letters that the suspect sent to the accuser. Physical evidence may also be found in acts of vandalism that were done in an effort to threaten or frighten the intimate partner or in the suspect’s DNA that may be left on a licked envelope or on another device that the defendant used to stalk his or her intimate partner.

Because stalking has received so much publicity (due in large part to celebrity stalking), people are eager to find defendants guilty of this crime. The same can be said about domestic violence crimes in this state, as they, too, receive quite a bit of media attention. As a result, the defendant already has two strikes against him when being tried for an intimate partner violence stalking case and, if physical evidence exists that additionally supports the prosecutor’s theory of guilt, the jury will find it that much easier to convict the accused. This is another reason why it is imperative for the defendant to hire a skilled defense attorney who is familiar with and understands all of the ways that physical evidence can be used in a D.V. stalking case and who will aggressively fight to admit it or exclude it depending on what is in the best interests of his or her client.

Physical evidence in a stalking case could be fabricated in an effort to falsely accuse an intimate partner. This is one reason why the experienced attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm work with private investigators and expert witnesses who examine physical evidence to validate its authenticity. Private investigators take photos of the crime scene, interview witnesses, do background checks on those witnesses to determine their credibility and collect evidence that an attorney may not be able to obtain. Expert witnesses listen to the voice on an answering machine, examine the handwriting on a letter and watch any video recordings to make sure that they are genuine. After collecting this type of information, the investigator, expert and lawyer discuss their findings and the attorney then creates the most effective defense strategy possible.

Physical evidence can play a critical role in a domestic abuse stalking trial. The outstanding attorneys at the Kavinoky Law Firm know this and understand the ways to respond to it so that it favors their clients. Their training in these types of cases is directly responsible for their impeccable record. Click here for a free consultation.

Prevention: How to Stop the Cycle of Domestic Violence

California domestic violence laws define domestic violence as physical, emotional or financial abuse that is directed at a family member (one’s child, grandchild, parent or grandparent) or at an intimate partner. Intimate partners, regardless of their sexual orientation, are significant others, former significant others, married, divorced, living together or formerly lived together, and those who have children together. When this type of abuse is targeted at one of the above listed people, the result is that the perpetrator will face specific Domestic Violence consequences in addition to the consequences that he or she faces for whatever crime he or she committed, because of the fact that the crime will be prosecuted as one of domestic abuse.

Domestic violence and, more specifically intimate partner abuse, is a real problem in this country and knows no ethnic, social or economic boundaries. It affects partners, families and children, friends and communities and has devastating, lasting effects on the abused. The goal of prevention is to stop Domestic Violence, and effective prevention should raise awareness about this growing problem, should stop abusive behavior and should empower victims of domestic violence to leave their abusive relationships. Although this country has made significant improvements in the ways that it responds to this issue, much more needs to be done to ultimately prevent the cycle of domestic violence.

Education is the key to the prevention of intimate partner violence. Counselors and medical professionals must receive training on recognizing the signs of abuse and how to approach an individual that they suspect is being abused. Victims must receive information on their rights and about resources that are available to assist them. The public must be made aware that domestic violence, in any form, is a crime and that offenders will receive severe punishment.

Prevention, in order to be successful, must address three issues. The first focuses on stopping the problem before it starts, which primarily is achieved through educating young persons about the problem. The second issue addresses services for “at-risk” individuals and provides resources to help these people identify known or suspected risk factors. This issue targets individuals, for example, who were either abused as children and therefore may be prone to domestic violence as adults, people with substance abuse issues, or anyone who may have exhibited violent behavior. The third issue is controlling behavior that already exists. This, for example, is punishment that a court imposes on a person convicted of a Domestic Violence-related crime as a result of the abuse that he or she already caused to his or her intimate partner or other family member.

Preventing domestic violence is the key to restoring and maintaining equality within a relationship that is affected by an imbalance of power. If successful, a couple or family will live in an environment that values respect, support, trust, honesty and accountability, responsible parenting, and economic equality, and that rejects violent, threatening and intimidating behavior.

If an individual thinks that he or she may be the victim of domestic or intimate partner abuse or thinks that he or she may need help for his or her own potential abusive behavior, there are signs and symptoms of domestic violence that are commonly recognized as requiring professional attention. Counseling and a host of other resources, easily accessible online, exist for both the victims of abuse and for the partners or family members who abuse those victims. Help is available for those who wish to seek it. The California domestic violence attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm can educate a DV victim about his or her rights and about where to get help, and will also fight for an individual accused of domestic violence. To discuss a domestic or intimate partner violence issue, contact The Kavinoky Law Firm today for a free consultation.

Battered Person’s Syndrome and its Role in a California Domestic Violence Trial for Criminal Threats

“Criminal threats” falls under California’s domestic violence laws when the individual who was threatened was the intimate partner of the accused. Intimate partners include persons who are married, divorced, cohabiting, dating, formerly dated and who have children together. When an individual threatens to commit a crime against his or her intimate partner that would result in death or serious bodily injury to that partner, he or she could be found guilty of this domestic abuse crime. It doesn’t matter how the threat was delivered or whether the accused actually intended to carry out the threat. The only relevant fact is whether the intimate partner reasonably feared for his or her safety or for the safety of his or her family.

Battered person’s syndrome is a recognized psychological condition that is becoming more prevalent in California’s D.V. cases. While it is more commonly called battered woman’s syndrome, battered women’s syndrome or B.W.S., it applies to both men and women who are consistently and/or severely victimized by their partners. The syndrome can be used to defend the actions of the accused or as evidence against a defendant. Because of its increasing frequency in intimate partner violence trials, it is critical for the accused to hire a criminal defense lawyer from The Kavinoky Law Firm who has experience dealing with battered person’s syndrome and who can skillfully use it to his or her client’s advantage or discredit it entirely.

Battered person’s syndrome may be used to defend the accused in a criminal threats trial based on evidence that the accused has also been victimized by his or her partner and honestly felt that the threat was necessary in order to avoid his or her own death or a serious injury. When used in this manner, the defendant is saying that he or she made the threat in self-defense, which can act as a defense to the crime. In order for this defense to work, it is imperative that the defendant has an attorney who understands the intricacies behind this syndrome and who will retain an expert witness to explain its significance to the judge and jury.

Battered person’s syndrome is more frequently used as evidence against a defendant, introduced by the prosecutor. This generally happens when the accuser recants his or her allegations. The prosecutor brings in an expert witness to testify that the accuser has been so severely abused by his or her partner that he or she is either changing his or her story or is refusing to cooperate out of fear for what might otherwise happen. A good defense attorney will anticipate this strategy and prepare for it by hiring a defense expert witness who will rebut this theory and address the many legitimate reasons why an accuser might recant.

The attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm receive ongoing training and education with respect to intimate partner abuse and the many evidentiary issues that commonly arise within these types of trials. They are well-qualified to successfully introduce battered person’s syndrome as a defense or to refute it should it be used against their client. When an individual is charged with making criminal threats against his or her intimate partner, the consequences are too severe to trust an inexperienced attorney. One of the knowledgeable lawyers at The Kavinoky Law Firm can outline a proven defense strategy during a free consultation.

DNA Evidence and its Role in a California Domestic Violence Criminal Threats Case

Domestic violence laws include a variety of crimes that are committed against one’s intimate partner. Intimate partners include heterosexual and same-sex partnerships where the individuals are married, divorced, living together, dating, formerly dated or have children together. In California, if an individual makes a criminal threat against his or her intimate partner, he or she will be charged with criminal threats as a domestic abuse violation and will be prosecuted accordingly.

“Criminal threats” is charged when an individual threatens, either verbally or in writing, to commit a crime against his or her intimate partner that will result in serious bodily injury or death to that partner. It does not matter if the accused actually intended to carry out the threat, only that he or she made it and that it was clear enough that the partner reasonably feared for his or her own safety or for the safety of his or her family. Depending on the circumstances of the charged incident, a defendant convicted of this crime faces either a misdemeanor or a felony, punishable by up to one year in the county jail or state prison.

DNA evidence plays a vital role in convicting suspects and in clearing the falsely accused. A person’s DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) remains constant throughout his or her life and is specific to that individual, which means that no two people, with the exception of identical twins, have the same DNA. The importance of that, and the reason that this type of evidence is being so widely used throughout this country, is if someone’s DNA can be collected from a crime scene or from physical evidence related to the allegation, it can either link the accused to the crime or exclude him or her from being involved in the crime.

DNA is found in virtually every cell in the body and is commonly retrieved from one’s blood, saliva, bone, skin tissue or hair. In a D.V. criminal threats case, DNA would likely be found in the saliva on a licked envelope that contained the threatening letter or on the accuser’s body or clothes if there was physical contact between the defendant and his or her intimate partner at the time of the alleged offense. If the defendant’s DNA was retrieved from these or from any other location that was involved in the charged incident, it may be easier to convict that individual for the crime. However, if someone else’s DNA was found on that envelope or on the partner’s body or clothes, it may be easier to clear the accused of that crime.

Because DNA evidence is becoming so prevalent in intimate partner abuse cases, it is critical that an accused hires an attorney who understands the science behind this type of evidence and who is familiar with the ways that it can be used during a trial. The experienced attorneys at The Kavinoky Law Firm receive ongoing training in domestic violence law and on the evidentiary issues, such as DNA evidence, that frequently arise during these types of cases. They have successfully defended countless individuals facing criminal threats charges by preparing the most comprehensive defense strategies possible.