Category: News

Are you a wobbler? You are if you drive without a valid license in California

driving car on the mountain roadWhile it may seem like a minor offense to some, in California driving with a suspended or revoked license can lead to some hefty fines and even jail time. This particular part of the state’s vehicle code even has a classification of its own: wobbler.

What does this mean? Basically, a wobbler offense means the end result of being convicted wobbles between an infraction or a misdemeanor, and the latter comes with a criminal record.

Having a skilled attorney by your side if you’re ever in this situation can be a game changer, as there are many circumstances in which jail time or fines can be avoided. It’s a matter of knowing how this particular offense is handled.

Understanding the legal definition

First, it’s helpful to have a handle on what this part of the vehicle code even means. There are basically four different ways you can be found driving without a license:

  • Never obtaining one
  • Not being old enough to drive
  • Not renewing your license
  • Living in California, while driving with an out-of-state but not getting a state license

One important note: You aren’t considered in violation of this code if you’re simply not carrying your license. You can be charged with a different offense, though, and you may face a fine of up to $250 if found guilty of driving without a license in your possession. So, it’s always a good idea to carry it around at all times.

What are the penalties?

If you are charged with an infraction for driving without a license, the fines are usually no larger than $250. It’s when it ventures into misdemeanor territory that the penalties are greater. It may include the following:

  • Probation for up to 3 years
  • Fines of up to $1000
  • A county jail sentence of up to six months
  • Vehicle impoundment for 30 days, if you have a prior driving-related conviction record

Your legal offense is tied to your driving history. If it’s a first offense, it’s usually a fine. Repeated offenders, though, will likely get hit with a misdemeanor.

What to expect in court

The burden of proof once you hit the court system is also different than in many other cases — it’s much heavier for the defendant. In this case, the prosecution only needs to show that the driver was without a license at the time of the offense. This means the defendant has the burden of proof to show they had a valid license.

This one is strange in another way: it’s outdated. With most records in the electronic realm now, you would think it wouldn’t be as large of a concern. The reality is the law hasn’t been changed by the state legislature, so it stands as it is.

This is when having an experienced lawyer comes in handy. Making sure you have someone on your side to interact with police and prosecutors can help with dismissal or a reduction in the sentence.

The case against field sobriety tests in cannabis-related DUI cases

18833634 - cop suspecting a man of drunk drivingOne of the biggest fallacies we hear from clients regarding cannabis-related DUI charges (driving under the influence) is the notion that a failed field sobriety test is a valid indicator of intoxication. The truth is, science can’t prove that such assessments are valid nor that the results are reliable. In fact, studies have shown that there’s such a mixed bag of results related to validity that researchers are at odds with it, meaning the threshold of proof cannot generally be met through these means alone. Can it get you arrested? Yes. Does it mean you will be convicted? No.

SFSTs explained

If an officer suspects that a driver is under the influence, a typical method for determining probable cause for arrest is the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)-approved Standardized Field Sobriety Test, or SFST. The three-part test focuses on assessing reflexes and coordination. It consists of 1) standing on one leg, 2) walking and turning, and 3) evaluation of horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN), which is the ability to follow an object with the eyes, along with possible abnormal dilation of the pupils. [PRO TIP: If an officer does any type of assessment that deviates from the NHTSA standards, those results and the administration alone can be argued as unreliable if it goes to court.]

While these standards and practices are used on a regular basis related to alcohol, there is dispute as to the validity and reliability when the alleged intoxication is related to cannabis. In fact, there is legal precedent and research indicating SFSTs and FSTs (non standard) cannot and do not accurately or appropriately measure a cannabis-intoxication level, and therefore, have no place in serving as probable cause for arrest.

Legal precedent and lack of validity

In 2017, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, stated it saw no clear scientific, data-driven consensus as to whether or not FSTs are a reliable indicator of cannabis-related impairment. It determined that even if a Massachusetts officer performs FSTs, the officer is limited in how they can discuss the results in their testimony. They can indicate they performed an assessment, but they can’t state an opinion about what they saw.

Proponents of marijuana law reform are working to make the case that cannabis is different in the way it impacts the body’s psychomotor performance from other drugs, both legal and illegal. They point to research that shows “the risk of accident associated with cannabis-exposed drivers is lower than that of those exposed to other licit and illicit substances…” The study concludes that the influence of cannabis is “relatively subtle and short-lived” and that the “impact on psychomotor performance differs significantly from that of alcohol.” (AAA, An Evaluation of Data from Drivers Arrested for Driving Under the Influence in Relation to Per Se Limits for Cannabis, 2016)

Also of importance is the perspective on drug testing for the presence of possible intoxicants — namely THC or its metabolites. In a 2019 presentation at the 4th annual Marijuana Law Conference, the deputy director for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, or NORML, presented studies supporting the opinion that the effects of inhaled cannabis on psychomotor skills are “typically subtle,” resulting in “modest impairment,” and concluding that “the effects…on higher-level driving are minimal.” He opined that there’s no way to really know through testing using “per se thresholds” the recency of exposure to cannabis nor psychomotor impairment. (Armentano. 2015. Are THC concentrations appropriate for presuming psychomotor impairment? In. Tiftickjian. Medicolegal Aspects of Marijuana: Colorado Edition. Tucson: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company.)

The NHTSA itself notes in its Drugs and Human Performance Facts Sheets that it is “…currently impossible to predict specific effects [of THC] based on metabolite concentrations.” A 2011 study also indicates that unlike drugs of other types, “[p]atients who take cannabinoids at a constant dosage over an extensive period of time often develop tolerance to the impairment of psychomotor performance, so that they can drive vehicles safely (e117).

Don’t go it alone

This is just the tip of the iceberg on the subject of cannabis and impairment. Just because you are given a sobriety test for any type of intoxication doesn’t mean you will be convicted of a crime. But you have to be willing to accept that you don’t know what you don’t know, and when it comes to the law you want the best in your corner. We know what matters in a courtroom, we know what doesn’t, and we know how to build a solid case to support you. You do NOT want to try to navigate a DUI arrest of any type without an experienced attorney in your corner. We are here for you: 1-800-NoCuffs.

What to remember if you are pulled over for a DUI

41318904 - portrait of a young scared man pulled over by policeWe know what your mind is likely going through when you see those flashing red-and-blue lights in your rearview mirror. It’s the same thing that likely goes through many people’s minds in that situation: what did I do to get pulled over?

Whether or not you feel as if you are genuinely driving impaired or if you have had zero to drink – and are being pulled over anyway – the nervousness and anxiety that may happen at any traffic stop is as understandable as it is nerve-racking.

There’s some practical advice to remember when you are being pulled over for a DUI, and knowing what was said to you as well as the circumstances of the traffic stop can go a long way to help you if you are arrested.

Document it all

It’s important to remember that while it may feel like slow-motion in your head, the actual process of a DUI arrest can happen very quickly. The entire flow of it – the stop itself, the field sobriety test, the arrest, the release from custody – can be mere hours. This is why it’s vital that you document as much as you can during the process.

Putting down your memories of the arrest in some way as soon as you can – maybe even via notes on your phone – will be helpful as you navigate the court system with your attorney.

There are seven key elements of the DUI to document, and most involve the interactions with the police officer who is involved. Here are those seven elements to remember:

  • What happened when you were pulled over,
  • What the police officer said to you,
  • What the police officer said about field sobriety tests, and how they were conducted,
  • What the police officer said about a preliminary alcohol screening test (breathalyzer),
  • What happened during the arrest, and transportation to the police station,
  • What the police officer said about providing a chemical breath test
  • How the officer conducted the chemical breath test.

Why this is important to you

Writing down your recollections around parts of the arrest process, can provide your attorney with facts to support defenses in either the criminal DUI case in court or at your hearing with the DMV for your license.

If the police officer who conducted the DUI stop made a mistake in some way during those seven points of that traffic stop, or if he or she took some shortcuts, it’s possible that your rights have been violated in some way. If that is the case, the evidence collected would not be admissible and your case could be dismissed.

There are many ways that we can help you defend not only against a DUI charge, but other criminal charges, and we can also help you navigate the system if you already have a DUI conviction if that takes place. Learn more at NoCuffs.com, or call us at 1-800-NoCuffs.

Sealed juvenile records vs. expungement

Pencil with eraser erasing parts of the word PAST, which is written in all capital letters in dark fontImagine this scenario—as a teenager, you were in the wrong place at the wrong time and ended up in trouble with the law related to possession of alcohol as a minor. You took the steps to have your records sealed and moved on with your life, assuming that no one would ever be privy to that information.

Your assumption is correct in one sense but not the other. While it is true that a standard background check for employment or college application won’t yield convictions that have been sealed, there are other situations where they can be “unsealed.”

Do not confuse records being sealed with being expunged—a whole other process. It’s important to understand the differences so you can pursue the course that helps you achieve your goals.

Sealing of juvenile records

In general, you can begin the process of having your records sealed once you are:

  • 18 years old
  • It has been five years since the case was closed, or
  • It has been five years since your last contact with probation and you are deemed rehabilitated by a judge.

You’ll need to contact your county to request the necessary forms. You must list each instance you want sealed. If all of your records are in the same county, it typically takes about 90 days to complete. If you have records in more than one county, it can take up to 180 days. In some instances, the request itself is sufficient for approval. In other cases, you may need to participate in a hearing. The courts will notify you if this is the case.

There are three instances that typically lead to denial of a request to seal juvenile records:

  • You are convicted of a serious offense (listed in Welfare and Institutions Code 707b) above the age of 14,
  • The record is for an adult conviction in a criminal case,
  • You are convicted as an adult for an offense of moral turpitude (these crimes involve sex or drugs, if they are violent, or in some way run afoul moral standards).

Earlier we mentioned that there are some times when a sealed record can be “unsealed” and the information is available to the requestor for a specific purpose. These include:

  • Insurance companies: Car insurance companies can view any records you had with the DMV
  • Federal institutions: The federal government can access your sealed records for military enlistment or security clearance positions
  • The court system: The courts may view your sealed records in the event that you are a witness in a defamation case, or to decide if you are qualified for extended foster care after age 18
  • Prosecution: Prosecutors can look into your records to see if you can be entered into a deferred entry of judgment program.

You can always request your own records to be unsealed at any time.

Expungement

In California, expunged records are not removed in the sense that they just disappear. Instead, your records are updated to indicate that the charges were dismissed. This is an important differentiation—if your records have been expunged it is truthful to indicate “NO” on applications that ask if you have been CONVICTED of a crime.

According to California Penal Code 1203.4, you are eligible to apply for record expungement if you meet the following qualifications:

  • You were granted probation, completed all of its terms, and are no longer on probation
  • You have had no new arrests
  • Or, you have completed the terms of your probation and served at least half of the probationary term, and have had no new arrests

As with having records sealed, the decision is in the hands of the courts. Only with expungement, you’ll file a “Petition for Relief” form with the Superior Court of the county where you were convicted. There is a fee (which can be waived, if approved). It typically takes 8 -10 weeks after the court has received your application to come to a decision. If your conviction is a felony, a court hearing will be required as part of this process.

If you think you may be eligible for sealing of your juvenile records or expungement, you’ll want guidance from a seasoned attorney’s office. It may sound like simply filling out paperwork, but it’s in your best interest to talk through the options and processes to make sure your actions align with your end goals and that the process is done the right way.

We are here to help, day and night. Give us a call: 1-800-NoCuffs or visit our website for more information: https://www.NoCuffs.com.

The pillars of a DUI prosecutor’s case

Drinking and driving concept. Car key on a wooden table, pub

You’ve been arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) of drugs or alcohol. Now what?

First off, don’t panic. This is definitely easier said than done, but it’s important to keep your wits about you and not make a bad situation potentially worse by talking or acting out. Keeping a cool head will help on the legal side.

Focus on the following:
Document what happened. As soon as you have an opportunity, write down as many details as possible about what happened immediately before, during and after the event. Any details about what was said and done throughout are important, as they may help your attorney with defenses.

Don’t plead guilty. Just because you’ve been detained does not mean there is overwhelming evidence against you. You may feel pressured or even convinced that pleading guilty is the obvious solution, but do not make any decisions until you’ve consulted with an attorney who specializes in DUI cases. We’ve seen it all, from misdemeanors to felonies to multiple DUI arrests. This is no time to try and handle things on your own. Experts exist to help you navigate your situation, regardless of severity.

In DUI cases, the burden of proof falls on the prosecution. That means according to the law, a defendant should only be found guilty if the prosecution presents a 100% fact-driven case that has absolutely zero reasonable doubt.

Prosecutors tend to latch on to these four areas in DUI cases:
1- Physical signs and symptoms of being under the influence. You may have red eyes. You may have an odor. You are observed walking in an abnormal pattern. These are all subjective, based on the observations of the arresting officer(s).

2- Field sobriety test performance. Your balance may be off. You may be unsteady changing direction while walking. This doesn’t mean you are under the influence!

3- Driving pattern. Law enforcement authorities rely on 24 driving patterns identified by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that may indicate the driver is intoxicated. These include swerving, weaving and driving without headlights at night. All 24 may have zero correlation to levels of intoxication and with reasonable explanations for their occurrence.

4- Chemical test results or refusal to take the test. Test results may be impacted by improper administration, medications, medical conditions and more. And refusal to take a test does not equate to guilt.
If any of these four pillars of a prosecutor’s case is knocked down or even loosened, the whole case either falls apart or is shaky, which means reasonable doubt.

The most common sense rule of all is to avoid driving under the influence at all. Drink responsibly. Always have a designated driver. But, if you find yourself in need of legal assistance related to DUI, give us a call at 1-800-NoCuffs.

Three reasons to fight a DUI charge

Car keys are in a glass

Have you ever been pulled over or arrested for a DUI? Driving under the is a serious charge which can affect your ability to get a job. Because a DUI will show up on a criminal background check, you may want to consider fighting your DUI charge. Even if the police haven’t made a mistake or you are technically in violation of the law, you may still be able to have your charges reduced, which looks better on your record and means lower fines and fewer penalties.

But, let’s take a look at three common reasons for fighting a DUI charge.

1. Police misconduct or mistake
Even if you were driving under the influence, your charges can be dismissed if law enforcement officers did not follow proper DUI protocol. For example, the DUI arrest report and court testimony must be accurate and truthful. There are also protocols that the police officer must follow in regards to field sobriety tests and how they are conducted. After your release, write down everything you can remember about your arrest. Even the little details can be important.

2. If no probable cause was stated If there was no valid reason to pull you over
In California, the arresting officer must have probable cause to arrest you for driving under the influence and To pull you over, they also must demonstrate reasonable suspicion to pull you over. You might be pulled over for failing to use a turn signal, not stopping at a light or driving with a malfunctioning tail light, as well as swerving in your lane or going the wrong way. They must be able to articulate specific facts as to why they stopped you. If a cop pulls you over for any of these reasons and you are not under the influence, you may receive a warning and be sent on your way. But if the officer sees you committing one of these acts, he or she will also be looking for probable cause for a DUI charge. Common causes include open containers in the car, red eyes, slurred words, fumbling for your license and insurance card, and the smell of alcohol or drugs in the car.

3.If your blood alcohol test doesn’t accurately reflect the amount of alcohol in your body
There are a number of reasons a BAC (blood alcohol content) test may be inaccurate. People with diets high in protein and low in carbs — like the Atkins diet — or people who have medical conditions like diabetes and hypoglycemia, can easily fail a sobriety breath test because their bodies naturally produce more isopropyl alcohol when the body turns to stored fat for energy, rather than carbohydrates. The time of the test matters, too. Alcohol can take between 15 minutes and two hours to fully absorb into your system. Therefore, if you take a test at the police station two hours after your last drink, it is possible your BAC level will be much higher than it was when you were actually driving.

We understand a DUI arrest can feel hopeless, but it’s not. While you can’t erase the past, that doesn’t mean you don’t have control of your future. Be sure to act fast and contact your DUI lawyer in less than 10 days from your arrest. Whether you’ve been arrested for a DUI or just have questions, we’re here to help. https://www.NoCuffs.com/

Utah Governor Gary Herbert Officially Signs HB155, Lowering Utah’s Legal Limit to .05

Utah Governor Gary Herbert has signed HB155, making Utah the first state to lower its legal BAC to under 0.08. This comes as a shocking move to those in Utah and has been met with heavy opposition by citizens and researchers.Researchers and citizens do not feel that the new legal limit will do much to make the roads safer. According to Fox News, 3,818 phone calls, emails, and letters of opposition have been received asking for the .05 limit to be vetoed, citing the targeting of innocent citizens as a major concern. Researchers from the American Beverage Institute have found that 77% of alcohol-related traffic fatalities in Utah come from high-BAC and repeat offenders. This has prompted the ABI to release a statement urging Governor Herbert to veto the bill and instead implement a 24/7 Sobriety Program that targets repeat offenders and those with high-BAC.

Criminal Defense Attorney Darren Kavinoky believes the new law could take citizens who were “driving legally before this legislation and turn them into a convicted criminal, with all the direct and indirect consequences that come from that.”

Kavinoky is not shocked that restaurants and bars are concerned, citing reaching a .05 after “just a single drink” as a major possibility. Kavinoky believes the new law could “have a huge, chilling effect on business, and in the case of Utah, where tourism is a significant revenue source, could mean disastrous results.”

“There’s little debate over the notion that everyone wants to drive on safe roads. At the same time, I would be surprised if ‘Joe or Jane Citizen’ didn’t rebel against the idea of lowering the legal limit yet again.

There’s always a tension between the rights of the individual versus the interest of the government in enacting laws that preserve the safety of its citizens.  In this case, Utah appears to have tipped the scales against long-held notions of personal liberty and freedom.  This could backfire significantly.

“There is definitely a trend in the lowering of the legal limit,” Kavinoky believes, “in California DUI cases, for example, the legal limit for those people 21 and older used to be
.15, then it became .10, and then it was lowered to .08.  When certain states held out on dropping from .10 to .08, the federal government threatened to withhold funding to get them into line.  Those changes weren’t driven by science or safety, but by politics.”

Governor Herbert claims the newly passed law “does not target drinking” but rather makes for “good public policy”. Only time will tell how effective the new policy will be.

References: http://fox13now.com/2017/03/23/utahs-governor-says-he-will-sign-bill-lowering-dui-level-to-05-the-lowest-in-the-nation/

http://www.responsiblelimits.com

 

Southern California’s Privatized Jails are Garnering Serious Attention

“Southern California’s Criminal Law pay-to-stay jail programs are now garnering serious attention” says Criminal Defense Lawyer Darren Kavinoky, founder of 1800NoCuffs.

Convicted criminals can reserve their spot in a Southern California private jail for as little as $25/night. This has sparked controversy over what the LA Times calls a “two-tiered justice system” that allows those convicted of serious crimes to “buy their way into safer and more comfortable jails”.

On average, 87% of pay-to-stay tenants are non-violent offenders, largely California DUI arrests. The other 13% includes those convicted of violence, threats of violence, or sex crimes according to data collected by the LA Times and the Marshall Group.

Private jails have their tenants’ full support. Those occupying and running the private jails have claimed that the private jails provide a safe alternative to county jail, a place where the young, old, rich, and famous are susceptible to mental and physical abuse.

Shane Sparks, a hip-hop choreographer convicted for sexual intercourse with a minor under the age of 16, compared his time spent in jail to a “retreat”. Amenities in the cells include flat-screen TVs, new beds, choice of bedding, and freedom to go to work while being incarcerated.

“While this may seem offensive on its face, the truth is that many criminal defenders are ‘soft,’ meaning that putting them into Los Angeles or Orange County Jail would subject them to all manners of physical, psychological, and emotional trauma. The truth is that our criminal recidivism rates are ridiculous, about 70% depending on who’s study you read. Unless someone goes into a jail environment determined to use it as an opportunity to turn their life around, all we are doing is sending people to a graduate school for crime” says `Darren Kavinoky.

Victims have heavily scrutinized the pay-to-stay options claiming a lack of rehabilitation due to the aforementioned trauma factor being eliminated.

Upon finding out his assailant would be attending private jail due to being “afraid of the general population”, Tanner Mester, a stabbing victim, called these fears “part of jail” and “what makes you not want to go back”.

Multiple victims have stepped up to speak out against the pay-to-stay option for violent criminals, mainly siding with Mester, citing a lack of rehabilitation. Kavinoky adds that “County jail is both for people who have been convicted of misdemeanor crimes and for all people who are awaiting trial for all types of crimes from murder to sidewalk spitting. This means we’re taking someone who’s been pulled over for 1st offense DUI and housing them with someone who’s been charged with murder. Expecting someone who has been pulled for 1st offense DUI to come out ‘new and improved’ in this instance is simply wrong. It’s like rearranging the deck chairs on a ship called the ‘Titanic’. You can feng shui those deck chairs all you want but if you don’t deal with your iceberg problem that ship is going down.”

References: http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-me-pay-to-stay-jails/#nt=oft09a-6gp1

The Gender Gap

Susan Haber, Senior Managing Attorney, The Kavinoky Law Firm

There isn’t a woman who works in the area of criminal law who doesn’t have a story about a time (or 20!) she was the only female attorney in the courtroom.

At the age of 25 I was a first-year prosecutor with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.  Bright-eyed and enthusiastic about the start of my career; I was determined to be a zealous legal advocate for the State of California and the protection of our society.

I vividly recall the day I was prosecuting a 5-defendant felony embezzlement case.  As the judge called the case to be heard, I realized that I sat alone on one side of the attorney table while five middle-aged male defense attorneys sat with their 5 male clients on the opposing side. I felt like Snow White.

The gender gap I have experienced, both as a former prosecutor and now as a criminal defense attorney, is not unique unto myself.  After conducting a bit of research on the subject of female criminal defense attorneys as well as speaking with numerous colleagues over 18 years of practicing criminal law, I am saddened by the stories I have heard and the statistics.

In one article I reviewed, among all attorneys appearing in criminal cases, 67% are men. Looking at attorneys appearing as lead counsel (first-chair), 67% are men (making 33% women). When looking at attorneys appearing as trial attorney, 79% are men and only 21% are women.

Additionally, the study found that there is a great distinction between criminal prosecution work and defense work among women and men. For example, 34% of attorneys who appeared as the lead attorney in criminal cases were for the government (the prosecution) were men as opposed to 66% of the attorneys who appeared on behalf of defendants were men.

In looking at women who appeared as the lead attorney in criminal cases, the ratio is reversed: women were 69% of the attorneys who presented the government and 31% of the attorneys who represented defendants were women.  What is even more interesting from this study is that the percentage of women drop from handling 33% of criminal cases as the lead attorney in a criminal case to 21% as the trial attorneys.

What do all these statistics mean?  I provide you with my impressions; not those who conducted the study.  Women are far less represented as a group in criminal defense as they are in on the prosecutorial side.  I don’t feel that has ANYTHING to do with the morals or values of prosecuting criminals or defending them. I believe this has to do with the lack of equal opportunities available for women attorneys to work in the area of criminal defense private practice.

I am a wife and mother of two school-aged children who wants nothing more than having our society protected from harm.  I want my children to feel safe walking down the street without fear. I also firmly believe that every person on this earth should have the right to competent legal counsel if they are accused of a crime. If you were charged with a criminal offense, wouldn’t you want the very BEST attorney, male or female, to help you?  I would!

Despite the gender gap and all that goes with it, I would never want to practice any other kind of law.  I LOVE the courtroom, the cases, and the people I meet. I hope I am a positive role model for my daughter and son who embodies independence, strength and perseverance, along with poise, femininity and vulnerability (we are all vulnerable to something and should not be afraid to show it!) as I zealously advocate for my family and clients.

Supreme Court rules in favor of Duane Buck

The Supreme Court ruled 6-2 in favor of Duane Buck, a convicted murderer, citing Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion that Buck demonstrated “ineffective assistance of counsel”.

Mr. Buck was originally sentenced to death in 1997 for shooting his ex-girlfriend. Buck attempted to appeal the sentence, but ultimately had his appeal rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in 2015. Per the new ruling, Buck has now been granted the right to a new hearing in the Texas Appeals Court, in large part due to previous racial discrimination.

I checked in with Criminal Defense Attorney Darren Kavinoky to further explain the significance of the SCOTUS ruling. Kavinoky believes this case “presents an interesting legal issue, at an especially interesting time in our country’s national conversation around race.”

The 6-2 ruling is not a question of guilt, but rather what Kavinoky calls a “question [of] whether legally inadmissible evidence was introduced during [Mr. Buck’s] sentencing hearing”, referencing the use of race in Mr. Buck’s death sentence.

“There’s no question that Buck committed the murder that has now put him on death row,” Kavinoky says.

“For context,” Kavinoky says, “in capital murder cases, crimes that are eligible for the death penalty, the trial is broken into two phases.” These phases are what Kavinoky describes as “the guilt phase, where the prosecution has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; and the penalty phase, where the jury deliberates between life in prison and the death penalty.”

“When you get to the penalty phase, those are the only two choices,” Kavinoky says, referencing the jury’s choice of punishment for the defendant, life in prison, and the death penalty. “We are well beyond the point of determining whether someone should be set free”, Kavinoky adds.

“During the penalty phase, the jurors are routinely asked to determine whether factors of aggravation outweigh factors of mitigation or vice versa. This will tip the scales in favor of one of the two punishments”, Kavinoky says.

Kavinoky explains that during the penalty phase, “evidence was introduced that Mr. Buck’s race was an aggravating factor to be considered in determining his criminal punishment.”

While the prosecution is arguing that the defense is, what Mr. Kavinoky calls, “making a mountain out of a molehill by twisting the emphasis on one of many items of evidence, the defense position that this was so facially inappropriate as to render his lawyer incompetent – a very high standard to meet—was enough to make the appellate court sit up and pay attention.”

“Buck now has a date with the appellate court, where he hopes the outcome will be that a new penalty phase sentencing hearing is ordered”, Kavinoky says. “If that happens, he’ll have an opportunity to spare his life. If not,” Kavinoky adds, “Texas has a way of acting very quickly when it comes to carrying out the ultimate criminal punishment”.